Live data from Hacker News

Tao Te Ching – Translated by Ursula K. Le Guin

github.com

11–20 of 104 posts

Re: Tao Te Ching – Translated by Ursula K. Le Guin

#11
As another comment points out, Le Guin herself does not call this a translation, so we shouldn't misrepresent it (although it might be my favorite English version).

However, it's not in the public domain. Her work deserves all the attention it can get, but I'd rather not see it pirated wholesale.

Re: Tao Te Ching – Translated by Ursula K. Le Guin

#13
post #11

As another comment points out, Le Guin herself does not call this a translation, so we shouldn't misrepresent it (although it might be my favorite English version). However, it's not in the public domain. Her work deserves all the attention it can get, but I'd rather not see it pirated wholesale.

> However, it's not in the public domain. Her work deserves all the attention it can get, but I'd rather not see it pirated wholesale.

I don't disagree. Does github have a way to report copyright violations?

I just bought the real book from Powell's. Several buying options: https://www.ursulakleguin.com/lao-tzu-the-tao-te-ching

Re: Tao Te Ching – Translated by Ursula K. Le Guin

#14
This is one of my favorite versions, mostly for nostalgic reasons. My initial exposure to the Tao te Ching was this "rendition" and Stephen Mitchell's version. Comparing the two was always very thought provoking; the approach is very different between them.

I often come to this site and compare chapters across multiple versions: https://ttc.tasuki.org/display:Code:gff,sm,jc,rh

Some are more poetic, some are more literal, and keeping with the theme, both of them are just as important.

Re: Tao Te Ching – Translated by Ursula K. Le Guin

#18

From the bottom: > This is a rendition, not a translation. I do not know any Chinese. I could approach the text at all only because Paul Carus, in his 1898 translation of the Tao Te Ching, printed the Chinese text with each character followed by a transliteration and a translation. My gratitude to him is unending.

Having done a similar "rendition" to a book of poetry, I agree it is not the same as translating directly. It does open up a question about the fuzziness of "what is even translation?"

Especially when we talk about translating historic writing. Yes, not knowing the source language is a huge barrier. But so is not knowing specific cultural touchstones or references in the text. In-depth translations usually transliterate as a part of the process. Many words and language patterns are untranslatable, which is why perfect translations are impossible.

When translating poetry, issues of meter and rhythm are even more important. It comes down to what the purpose of a translation is meant to achieve. Yes, there are ideas and themes but there is no hiding the fact that translators always imprint their own perspective on a work - it's unavoidable and personally shouldn't even be the goal.

Most translators of popular texts look closely at other translations to "triangulate" on meaning and authorial intent. Older translations may use archaic writing but have historical understanding, well-researched translations may be more precise about tricky words or concepts. More "writerly" translations tend to rebuild the work from the building blocks and produce a more cohesive whole. None of these are wrong approaches.

I like the term "rendition" because it throws away the concept of the "authoritative translation". I like to think of translations the same way as cover songs. The best covers may be wildly different from the original but they share the same roots.

As a reader, if you can't ever "hear" the original because you don't know thr language you can still appreciate someone's "cover version", or triangulate the original by reading multiple translations.

Re: Tao Te Ching – Translated by Ursula K. Le Guin

#19
post #8

From the bottom: > This is a rendition, not a translation. I do not know any Chinese. I could approach the text at all only because Paul Carus, in his 1898 translation of the Tao Te Ching, printed the Chinese text with each character followed by a transliteration and a translation. My gratitude to him is unending.

Honestly, even if you know Chinese, it's very hard to translate Tao Te Ching into English. Hell, it's hard to translate it into Chinese. Even the first paragraph is controversial. For example this rendition says: > The name you can say > isn’t the real name. However, in a 5th century interpretation[0], it's more akin to: > The fame and wealth the mortals praise are not a natural state. (My extremely simplified paraph…

Interesting. Your comparison reminds me of something from Lacanian psychoanalysis: the idea that people often mistake themselves for the symbolic labels they occupy, their title for instance. Like a doctor who would praise himself for being a doctor, a president a president. From that perspective, both versions of the Tao Te Ching line point to the same thing: what can be named, praised, or socially recognized isn’t the true underlying reality. Different phrasing, but the same structural idea.

Re: Tao Te Ching – Translated by Ursula K. Le Guin

#20
post #10
post #4

HN seems to like Tao Te Ching. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

I found these. Others? Tao Te Ching translated by Ursula Le Guin (1997) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40886419 - July 2024 (118 comments) Tao Te Ching – Gia-Fu Feng, Jane English Translation (1989) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38058843 - Oct 2023 (99 comments) Tao Te Ching - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37686713 - Sept 2023 (170 comments) 175 translations of of the Tao Te Ching - https://ne…

In one of those threads a user, thadk, posted their really cool tool that shows a side by side comparison of English translations for each verse

https://thadk.net/sbs/#/display:Code:gff,sm,jhmd,uklg,jc,rh/...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40887305

Post reply on HN