Live data from Hacker News

The secret medieval tunnels that we still don't understand

weirdmedievalguys.substack.com

11–20 of 57 posts

Re: The secret medieval tunnels that we still don't understand

#11

Maybe it was like a safe. If people wanted to steel something it would take them a very long time and they would be very easy to stop from ever coming out alive.

That's what buried silver hoards are for, which have the additional advantage of being pretty much unfindable after the sod reintegrates overhead.

Re: The secret medieval tunnels that we still don't understand

#12

Based on just this article, it seems far most likely to me that it was a place to hide during an attack. > And while three brave explorers in the 21st century once spent 48 hours in an erdstall, crawling to new sections whenever oxygen became scarce, it seems unlikely that they would have been constructed as hiding places, even temporary ones. Though they could have provided refuge for a small family, why would they…

There's zero reason to expect remnants of food, as well. It was not shelf(tunnel)-stable.

Re: The secret medieval tunnels that we still don't understand

#13
FTFA:

This clandestine treatment would have made sense had the erdstall been built as escape routes in case of invaders, but this can’t have been their purpose. They only ever have one entrance, usually located beneath the floor of a church or farmhouse, or simply under the flagstones of a town square.

That SCREAMS "hidey hole in case of invaders", to me. Like the hole Saddam Hussein was discovered hiding in.

If the countryside is overrun with invaders, there's literally no place for peasants to escape to. But if you can safely hide until dark, you have a chance. If you can wait out until the invaders pass through to their objective (strategic castle, opposing force...), you survive.

Re: The secret medieval tunnels that we still don't understand

#15

Based on just this article, it seems far most likely to me that it was a place to hide during an attack. > And while three brave explorers in the 21st century once spent 48 hours in an erdstall, crawling to new sections whenever oxygen became scarce, it seems unlikely that they would have been constructed as hiding places, even temporary ones. Though they could have provided refuge for a small family, why would they…

There's zero reason to expect remnants of food, as well. It was not shelf(tunnel)-stable.

There would still be signs. The food rots - but it would leave traces.

Re: The secret medieval tunnels that we still don't understand

#19
Is it possible they're the medieval equivalents of dry-wells? Why build something big-enough for people if all you want to do is accommodate run-off or sewage? What's the geology like; porous vs. no-porous? Porous enough for storm drainage, maybe? It seems a stretch to call them secret. Why document something as common as a drain?
Post reply on HN