Abysmally low pixel density. :(
Eh, it's about the same as a 4K display at 33".
Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
11–20 of 370 posts
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
#12The pixels per inch (ppi) density is 129. Some other specs: refresh rate, 120Hz; brightness, 400 cd/m².
That's decent pixel density considering the size of the monitor. A 32" 4K monitor has slightly higher PPI at around 138.
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
#13[flagged]
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
#14Nice. I have the predecessor 40" U4025QW and it's outstanding.
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
#15[flagged]
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
#16The pixels per inch (ppi) density is 129. Some other specs: refresh rate, 120Hz; brightness, 400 cd/m².
That's decent pixel density considering the size of the monitor. A 32" 4K monitor has slightly higher PPI at around 138.
I have a 40in 5k (32in 4k, but wider). IMHO, 138ppi is the bare minimum, but it really depends on a person's eyesight and preferences.
I would love a large-ish ultra-wide with > 160ppi. One day, maybe, that being said, by that time those things will exist and be reasonably priced, my eyes might not be able to appreciate the difference.
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
#17At 52" I now believe that there is a limit to the size of a monitor. This might have crossed it.
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
#18I have a 34" ultrawide and it is huge. I can't imagine a 52" - the edges would be so far away that it must be hard to read text without physically moving left/right
I think you would have to sit further back, almost tv watching distance.
Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor
#19The smaller sizes would be nice if they had a 16:10 option. 16:9 just isn't a very nice aspect ratio imo, the extra height on 16:10 is much better.