Musk's X could be banned in Britain over AI chatbot row

Post by bdbdjfjrbrbf » Fri, Jan 09, 2026, 1:32 AM UTC

labrador wrote: post #9

bdbdjfjrbrbf wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Other image generation models aren't trained on porn so they don't know how to produce it. Not true. Google’s models are excellent at making adult content, they just have aggressive pre and post filtering, but it’s not perfect and glimpses of its dirty mind slip through the cracks. (I’m not sure about OpenAI, its filtering is much more aggressive so it’s harder to probe. I’ve seen it make sexualized content, but I…

This is what Gemini says although it may be a hallucination Google invests in the safety of its training data from the outset. This involves efforts to filter out problematic content, such as violent, offensive, or sexually explicit material, before or during the model training phase. The aim is to ensure the models are trained on appropriate data consistent with Google's AI Principles and policies. The company has a…

Post by ben_w » Fri, Jan 09, 2026, 11:43 AM UTC

Jigsy wrote: post #10

It's horrifying how many people in the UK support blocking Twitter because the AI tool is being misused. And based on an article I saw about one of the Japanese princesses, it was basically "@grok undress her" rather than elaborate prompts people seem to believe? Given that the UK is trying to block 4chan via the scenic route, this, in my opinion, just gives the government incentive to block any website in the future…