DDoSecrets does a wonderful public service, and I'm glad they exist.
Distributed Denial of Secrets
11–20 of 42 posts
Re: Distributed Denial of Secrets
#12DDoSecrets does a wonderful public service, and I'm glad they exist.
[dead]
Re: Distributed Denial of Secrets
#13[flagged]
These people are actively working towards genociding groups of people. It’s not just a ”stupid ideology”. It’s a murderous ideology, it’s an ideology that actively denies the humanity and life of people. These people chose to do that, they chose to support and work their society towards a new holocaust.
[flagged]
Re: Distributed Denial of Secrets
#14[flagged]
> Nazi ideology is disgusting
Disgusting is the least of its problems. I'm not saying this in connection to the privacy issue, it's just weird to see something like "death is icky, it smells bad".
> I don't think being an asshole with retarded ideology is enough to lose your fundamental human rights.
I don't know who is being doxed by WhiteLeaks, but again, the bigger problem is that doxing creates threats to personal welfare, health and life.
I'm not sure how doxing can be stopped in the current polarized political environment, both sides use it as a weapon... because it works as such. Maybe we should focus on that problem instead.
Re: Distributed Denial of Secrets
#15[flagged]
If your ideology involves hurting people, to a point, you should be left alone by the government. but by that same principle, others should be left alone too when they show similar levels of hostility or worse.
You shouldn't lose your fundamental human rights, up to a point, that point is when you start believing and spreading a belief that other people should lose their fundamental human rights.
Re: Distributed Denial of Secrets
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
These people are actively working towards genociding groups of people. It’s not just a ”stupid ideology”. It’s a murderous ideology, it’s an ideology that actively denies the humanity and life of people. These people chose to do that, they chose to support and work their society towards a new holocaust.
> These people are actively working towards genociding groups of people (Emphasis mine). No they aren't. Or rather some of them may, but many aren't. Many of them are just brainwashed terminally online dudes who believe progressive values are why they can't be happy. These people don't actively work towards anything, they are literal losers. (I have a family relative who's like that, he says he wants to build a Chris…
[dead]
Re: Distributed Denial of Secrets
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
These people are actively working towards genociding groups of people. It’s not just a ”stupid ideology”. It’s a murderous ideology, it’s an ideology that actively denies the humanity and life of people. These people chose to do that, they chose to support and work their society towards a new holocaust.
[flagged]
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has documented over 100 people killed in the United States and Canada in attacks committed by extremists linked to the white supremacist movement since 2014.
google is your friend
Re: Distributed Denial of Secrets
#18[flagged]
> Nazi ideology is disgusting Disgusting is the least of its problems. I'm not saying this in connection to the privacy issue, it's just weird to see something like "death is icky, it smells bad". > I don't think being an asshole with retarded ideology is enough to lose your fundamental human rights. I don't know who is being doxed by WhiteLeaks, but again, the bigger problem is that doxing creates threats to persona…
The death of privacy is definitely a more fundamental issue here, outside of politics. In an ideal world, private citizens, even if they have notorious views, have a right to privacy.
Re: Distributed Denial of Secrets
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
These people are actively working towards genociding groups of people. It’s not just a ”stupid ideology”. It’s a murderous ideology, it’s an ideology that actively denies the humanity and life of people. These people chose to do that, they chose to support and work their society towards a new holocaust.
> These people are actively working towards genociding groups of people (Emphasis mine). No they aren't. Or rather some of them may, but many aren't. Many of them are just brainwashed terminally online dudes who believe progressive values are why they can't be happy. These people don't actively work towards anything, they are literal losers. (I have a family relative who's like that, he says he wants to build a Chris…
The road to new genocides is a core tenet of white supremacy. Denying that is like denying that Buddhists meditate. Maybe you need to ask yourself why you are consistently trying to defend people who stand outside my home shouting seig heil and want to murder me and people like me?
Re: Distributed Denial of Secrets
#20DDoSecrets does a wonderful public service, and I'm glad they exist.
[dead]
I got that impression too. Gatekeeping sensitive information is not necessarily bad, but the entire thing is sketchy. For example, is it legal or ethical for this group to have Washington Post data that was leaked or stolen? Are we really supposed to be against something called "Free Speech Union" because of the owners having controversial views? There is clearly a political angle to most of the stuff I've seen at a glance, and a lot of politics on one side only.