Live data from Hacker News

HP Reveals Keyboard Computer with Ryzen AI Chip

hp.com

11–20 of 128 posts

Re: HP Reveals Keyboard Computer with Ryzen AI Chip

#13
post #6

I want less microsoft/copilot in things, not more. I don't know who this is for.

I don't understand the advantages of this over a laptop (this is essentially laptop-grade hardware and thermal profile but without the screen & battery).

It has an optional battery. This could be pretty epic for a glasses interface.

Re: HP Reveals Keyboard Computer with Ryzen AI Chip

#18
> Launch Microsoft Copilot in Windows with a touch of the Copilot key,4 to write content, analyze data, and stay organized.

Oh thank goodness.

This whole product idea is further trying to gatekeep computing hardware. You will pay a cloud subscription to perform anything remotely computationally taxing.

Re: HP Reveals Keyboard Computer with Ryzen AI Chip

#19
post #7

Editorialized title ( The powerful AI PC that hides in plain sight ) Actual coverage from Ars: HP's EliteBoard G1a is a Ryzen-powered Windows 11 PC in a membrane keyboard (3 points) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46551335

Given the weird take on x86 being inherently "more powerful" and the copy-pasted error from the marketing site (32W vs 32WH) this "article" looks like gently massaged advertising copy:

> Alternatively, HP’s EliteBoard will bring Windows and a more powerful x86 architecture to the keyboard-PC form factor. HP says the EliteBoard will support Windows 11 Pro for Business and an AMD Ryzen AI 300-series processor with an up to 50 TOPs NPU. The device will be sold with a 32 W internal battery and is part of Microsoft’s Copilot+ PC program.

Re: HP Reveals Keyboard Computer with Ryzen AI Chip

#20
post #18

> Launch Microsoft Copilot in Windows with a touch of the Copilot key,4 to write content, analyze data, and stay organized. Oh thank goodness. This whole product idea is further trying to gatekeep computing hardware. You will pay a cloud subscription to perform anything remotely computationally taxing.

> You will pay a cloud subscription to perform anything remotely computationally taxing.

What’s wrong with that?

Post reply on HN