It's hard to justify Tahoe icons
11–20 of 984 posts
Re: It's hard to justify Tahoe icons
#12Re: It's hard to justify Tahoe icons
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
True, but you can turn it off with the snowflake icon at the top.
Ah, so you can. I tried that but the particles don't disappear immediately so I thought it was just toggling the colour scheme.
Re: It's hard to justify Tahoe icons
#14I hate to be that guy, but there's some irony in putting a full screen animated snow effect over an article about unnecessary, distracting clutter.
But yeah, maybe it helps that I have the scripting turned off.
Re: It's hard to justify Tahoe icons
#15Re: It's hard to justify Tahoe icons
#16I hate to be that guy, but there's some irony in putting a full screen animated snow effect over an article about unnecessary, distracting clutter.
Re: It's hard to justify Tahoe icons
#17Reminder, you can turn off the animated snow effect with the snowflake icon at the top
Re: It's hard to justify Tahoe icons
#18Reminder, you can turn off the animated snow effect with the snowflake icon at the top
Re: It's hard to justify Tahoe icons
#19[edit] I just discovered the snow icon, which does turn off the snow but turns the background into bright yellow. Oh and the other icon which turns your cursor into a ...spotlight? On an otherwise black page? Do I have that right? Which one of those things was a design decision that enhanced usability, or readability, or... anything at all? These choices can best be described as sophomoric. You can disagree with menu icons, but they at least in theory serve a purpose. What purpose is served by any of the gizmos on this site?