Live data from Hacker News

Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter

seangoedecke.com

11–20 of 59 posts

Re: Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter

#11

Kinda like photoshop 2 decades or so ago.

This comment is harmfully lazy. Is your position that a three word prompt is equivalent to armchair trolls goi g through the funnel - finding a way to obtain DRM-controlled software, learning that software to sufficient levels to understand the tools required of how to perform something akin to a deep fake, and then somehow gaining the art talent and experience required to put it into practice? Did I just get baited?

Re: Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter

#14
post #7

[flagged]

I don't think you need to prove reputational harm. Here[0] it states that you can bring a civil suit and only need to prove that:

>The defendant shared an intimate image of you without your consent, and

>The defendant knew that you did not consent, or recklessly disregarded whether or not you consented.

[0] https://www.justice.gov/atj/sharing-intimate-images-without-...

Re: Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter

#17

Anyone still using Twitter? Even before the AI rage, I stopped looking at it - in part because of a certain crazy techbro, but also because of the forced log-in-to-read. I am never going to log in there again, so this is now a walled-off garden to me.

I mostly switched to Bluesky, but I still check in when "major events" happen.

Re: Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter

#19
I'm interested in the claim that "OpenAI and Gemini have popular image models that do not let you do this kind of thing.". Is that actually true? Or do they just kinda try and it's possible to get around easily? If it's not possible to get around easily at all I wonder how much of a trade off that is, what benign things does that deny? Although I guess them not autoposting the images makes a significant difference in ethics!

Re: Grok is enabling mass sexual harassment on Twitter

#20
Maybe this will be benefitial to stop the overexposure of some young people on the internet. A bad thing that brings a good result, like the inverse of "the path to hell is paved with good intentions".

On the 90s we internet users tended to hide behind nicknames and posting photos of yourself was not the normal. Maybe we were more nerdy/introverted or scared about what could happen if people recognized us in the real life.

Then services like Facebook, MySpace, Fotolog attracted normal users and here we are now, the more you expose yourself on the net, the better.

Post reply on HN