QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
11–20 of 174 posts
Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
#12We'll see if it reaches bare metal some time, instead of relying on QEMU(on Ubuntu). In theory I'd be tempted to try, in practice not, because of all the back and forth between changing owners in the past, and resulting policies regarding availability. I'm also very well served by some 'gaming distro', where nothing ever stutters or lags, on almost obsolete hardware, mostly clocked down to 800Mhz, with uptimes of up…
Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
#13The page on https://devblog.qnx.com/about/ does not show what kind of company it is, who is behind it, and where they are located. Should I expect backdoors? Is it an elaborate front by north korea? Who will be able to remotely execute code on this operating system?
It's nearly 2026 and fake job applications by nation-state threat actors are common. If a new open source project with shiny marketing pops up it would really help if there is some proof that the org behind it consists of humans living in democratic countries.
Edit: The about page links to https://qnx.software/en which only shows a black screen for me.
Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
#14Marketing looks nice, but why do they make it so hard to build trust? If it's a software focused on developers it's really important to establish trust. The page on https://devblog.qnx.com/about/ does not show what kind of company it is, who is behind it, and where they are located. Should I expect backdoors? Is it an elaborate front by north korea? Who will be able to remotely execute code on this operating system?…
Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
#15Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
#16Bring back Photon. It was dang near perfect.
Photon was what I was hoping for before I clicked the link. One of my favourite GUIs, closely tied with CDE. Photon or not, I hated the period where they sort of moved to canned BSP deployment only, where in 6.5 I could just develop on a live system. This is nice.
In case you're not aware: CDE is still around, open source, and runs on modern unix-likes.
Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
#17Marketing looks nice, but why do they make it so hard to build trust? If it's a software focused on developers it's really important to establish trust. The page on https://devblog.qnx.com/about/ does not show what kind of company it is, who is behind it, and where they are located. Should I expect backdoors? Is it an elaborate front by north korea? Who will be able to remotely execute code on this operating system?…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QNX
Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QNX
Their main website is a black page. No idea if someone bought the brand or if it is the original people behind this 40 year old project. Both the wikipedia and the website only mention "canada" in passing but no information is given on company and people behind it. Nothing that can be verified.
Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
#19Re: QNX Self-Hosted Developer Desktop
#20We'll see if it reaches bare metal some time, instead of relying on QEMU(on Ubuntu). In theory I'd be tempted to try, in practice not, because of all the back and forth between changing owners in the past, and resulting policies regarding availability. I'm also very well served by some 'gaming distro', where nothing ever stutters or lags, on almost obsolete hardware, mostly clocked down to 800Mhz, with uptimes of up…
QNX is running on bare metal in a lot of cars.