Live data from Hacker News

Three ways to solve problems

andreasfragner.com

11–20 of 27 posts

Re: Three ways to solve problems

#11
There's a 4th way, but it works least often. Maybe Method 2.5 fits better: Wait for the problem to fix itself to your level of risk. Ex: This road is blocked. I have a good news it won't be blocked in X days/months/years. Let's just wait until it's a little better for us to travel down and do something else for a just little while. It's a hybrid between waiting for the path to open up for everyone and forcing your way through. Taking a stepping stone between changing the world and changing your solution to the problem.

Re: Three ways to solve problems

#12
A favorite of mine: assume a sub-problem has a solution (even though it doesn't), and solve everything else assuming that solution holds.

I find that after I do that, once I have a solution for everything else, a less-general solution to the sub-problem is often sufficient to keep the global solution valid.

Re: Three ways to solve problems

#15

A favorite of mine: assume a sub-problem has a solution (even though it doesn't), and solve everything else assuming that solution holds. I find that after I do that, once I have a solution for everything else, a less-general solution to the sub-problem is often sufficient to keep the global solution valid.

I wonder what a specific example of this approach would be.

Re: Three ways to solve problems

#19
post #15

A favorite of mine: assume a sub-problem has a solution (even though it doesn't), and solve everything else assuming that solution holds. I find that after I do that, once I have a solution for everything else, a less-general solution to the sub-problem is often sufficient to keep the global solution valid.

I wonder what a specific example of this approach would be.

I'm intrigued and would appreciate further examples/explanations too.

Re: Three ways to solve problems

#20
The site's text is medium blue on a gray background with a font-weight of 300. I'm all for a bit of visual variety and personal expressiveness but this is pushing the boundaries of accessible legibility on some systems and screens.

(Yes, I realize there are various browser accessibility tools, reader modes and even custom CSS overrides, but I'd prefer not being forced to force those things on for all sites - because it means that "bit of visual variety and personal expressiveness" no longer exists for increasing numbers of visitors.)

Post reply on HN