11–20 of 57 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Open source has an accepted and well understood meaning to developers; when people use the term to mean something other than that, it is 100% of the time for exploitative purposes, and they know they are being disingenuous.
Title says "open source", but the Business Source License (BSL) is not an Open Source Initiative (OSI) approved open-source license.
The correct term for things like BSL is “source available.”
Deleted comment pointed out that LICENSE.pdf is a screenshot from hashicorp. That's pretty weird, raised an issue for it.
Title says "open source", but the Business Source License (BSL) is not an Open Source Initiative (OSI) approved open-source license.
However, someone earlier today put me onto the concept of AGPL licenses so I changed MIRA over to AGPL because it still aligns with my overall intent of protecting my significant effort from someone coming in and Flappy Bird-ing it while still making it freely available to anyone who wants to access, modify, anything it.
This is really fascinating. I’d love to see a demo.
I looked at your web hosted version. It seemed really easy to get it to hang up when it's search tools raise an exception.
EDIT: Thanks for the feedback! I was able to pinpoint it to a change I made earlier today to allow simultanious OAI endpoints and the native Claude support. When on a model via a 3rd party provider certain parts of a toolcall were being stripped. Not any more! Pushed an update.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Open source has an accepted and well understood meaning to developers; when people use the term to mean something other than that, it is 100% of the time for exploitative purposes, and they know they are being disingenuous.
I've used the term for 25+ years to describe my own source-included free software projects, and I'll thank you (and OSI) for not policing my language. No trademark? No standing. Choose other crusades.
If you are on a Claude Pro/Max plan, can you use it by signing into your account? Or is it API only for now?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've used the term for 25+ years to describe my own source-included free software projects, and I'll thank you (and OSI) for not policing my language. No trademark? No standing. Choose other crusades.
I think they literally coined and defined the term over 25 years ago.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think they literally coined and defined the term over 25 years ago.
That's not how it works. They're entitled to their own opinion, but not to their own dictionary.