I'm not following the logic why contrails cause net warming. Why nuclear blasts - that also introduce lots of particles in atmosphere cause a cooling effect - "nuclear winter"?
The difference is that water vapour is a greenhouse gas. IIRC the net warming effect of clouds is a function of altitude.
Contrails Map
11–20 of 75 posts
Re: Contrails Map
#12I was expecting this to be a gag about chemtrails. I am glad I was wrong.
[flagged]
Downvoted for this, at the very least, and also downvoted for the fact you think you're entitled to an explanation even with your tone.
Re: Contrails Map
#13I was expecting this to be a gag about chemtrails. I am glad I was wrong.
[flagged]
There's plenty of basis for thinking it's uninformed or intellectually dishonest conspiracy mongering.
And please don't rant at HN.
Re: Contrails Map
#14I'm not following the logic why contrails cause net warming. Why nuclear blasts - that also introduce lots of particles in atmosphere cause a cooling effect - "nuclear winter"?
They don’t cause net warming, it’s transient. If we stopped flying tomorrow it would go away quickly. But we keep flying. But even with that the amount of warming this continuous effect creates is quite small and negligible compared to greenhouse gas warming and isn’t really worth talking about.
Re: Contrails Map
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> I am just so embarrassed on behalf of people who still think this doesn't exist and is all some conspiracy without any basis. There's plenty of basis for thinking it's uninformed or intellectually dishonest conspiracy mongering. And please don't rant at HN.
I was at a presentation in Croatia recently about weather modification in Yugoslavia. This is considered public knowledge there. When Yugoslavia fell apart, Croatia was no longer permitted to engage in weather modification.
The main method discussed was the use of small rockets. It was used for agricultural purposes.
Re: Contrails Map
#16I'm not following the logic why contrails cause net warming. Why nuclear blasts - that also introduce lots of particles in atmosphere cause a cooling effect - "nuclear winter"?
Re: Contrails Map
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I am just so embarrassed on behalf of people who still think this doesn't exist and is all some conspiracy without any basis. There's plenty of basis for thinking it's uninformed or intellectually dishonest conspiracy mongering. And please don't rant at HN.
I'm out of the loop, didn't the government admit this stuff a few years ago? I was at a presentation in Croatia recently about weather modification in Yugoslavia. This is considered public knowledge there. When Yugoslavia fell apart, Croatia was no longer permitted to engage in weather modification. The main method discussed was the use of small rockets. It was used for agricultural purposes.
If I was an evil government figure trying to secretly control weather, there are better ways of doing that (e.g. drones, rockets) than orchestrating a conspiracy that requires hundreds of thousands of people to stay quiet for decades.
Re: Contrails Map
#18Re: Contrails Map
#19I was expecting this to be a gag about chemtrails. I am glad I was wrong.
Re: Contrails Map
#20I’d like to see the literature and discovery of aircraft soot.
As an engineer who has built aircraft, I find this fascinating. I would like to measure my amount of soot. How does one go about measuring how much soot I have?
Obviously if my exhaust ports are black that’s bad but I’m genuinely curious about this as I’ve always assumed “black smoke bad, white smoke ok”. As for contrails, disturbing the atmosphere is going to cause some freezing (clouds) at that altitude, at that temperature. How do you suggest we mitigate that? Fly lower and burn more fuel? Fly less and tell people to take the train or that their package will arrive next week?