There was a theory floating around back in 2018 that the append-only nature of the SKS network makes it effectively illegal due to the GDPR "right to erasure" but nothing came of that and the SKS network is still alive:
Building a Transparent Keyserver
11–20 of 28 posts
Re: Building a Transparent Keyserver
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
I assume once it's stabilized you'd swap the `go run` for just installing and using a binary, similar to what you're already doing with age.
Honestly not sure why I didn't do that once the tool had stabilized. Switched to go install filippo.io/torchwood/cmd/age-keylookup@main age -r $(age-keylookup alice@example.com) age is designed to be composable and very stable, and this shell combination works well enough, so it's unlikely we'll build it straight into age(1).
But I was discussing it with some techies once and someone mentioned to me that it had less entropy (I think they mentioned 256 bits of entropy) whereas they wanted 512 bits of entropy which pgp supported
I can be wrong about what exactly they talked about since it was long time ago so pardon me if thats the case, but are there any "issues" that you know about in age?
Another thing regarding the transparent servers is that what really happens if the servers go down, do you have any thoughts of having fediverse-alike capabilities perhaps? And also are there any issues/limitations of the transparent keyserver that you wish to discuss
Also your work on age has been phenomenal so thank you for creating a tool like age!
Re: Building a Transparent Keyserver
#13The good old SKS network achieves most or all of the advantages of key transparency in a simpler way by being append-only. An attacker could downgrade your PGP identity on one server but the rest would have the newest version you uploaded to the network. There was a theory floating around back in 2018 that the append-only nature of the SKS network makes it effectively illegal due to the GDPR "right to erasure" but no…
Re: Building a Transparent Keyserver
#14Re: Building a Transparent Keyserver
#15Dunno, IMO you need to know the bits of what operator is running to fully trust the third party, eg run in an enclave and share attestation evidence and the source code. Otherwise, operator can just mimic the appearance of the log.
Re: Building a Transparent Keyserver
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly not sure why I didn't do that once the tool had stabilized. Switched to go install filippo.io/torchwood/cmd/age-keylookup@main age -r $(age-keylookup alice@example.com) age is designed to be composable and very stable, and this shell combination works well enough, so it's unlikely we'll build it straight into age(1).
Offtopic but I really appreciate golang and so I am always on the lookout of modern alternatives and I found age and I found it to be brilliant for what its worth But I was discussing it with some techies once and someone mentioned to me that it had less entropy (I think they mentioned 256 bits of entropy) whereas they wanted 512 bits of entropy which pgp supported I can be wrong about what exactly they talked about…
> I can be wrong about what exactly they talked about since it was long time ago so pardon me if thats the case, but are there any "issues" that you know about in age?
Entropy bikeshedding is very popular for PGP / GnuPG enthusiasts, but it's silly.
age uses X25519, HKDF-SHA256, ChaCha20, and Poly1305. Soon it will also use ML-KEM-768 (post-quantum crypto!). This is all very secure crypto. If a quantum computer turns out to be infeasible to build on Earth, I predict none of these algorithms will be broken in our lifetime.
PGP supports RSA. That's enough reason to avoid it.
https://blog.trailofbits.com/2019/07/08/fuck-rsa/
If you want more reasons:
Re: Building a Transparent Keyserver
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Offtopic but I really appreciate golang and so I am always on the lookout of modern alternatives and I found age and I found it to be brilliant for what its worth But I was discussing it with some techies once and someone mentioned to me that it had less entropy (I think they mentioned 256 bits of entropy) whereas they wanted 512 bits of entropy which pgp supported I can be wrong about what exactly they talked about…
> But I was discussing it with some techies once and someone mentioned to me that it had less entropy (I think they mentioned 256 bits of entropy) whereas they wanted 512 bits of entropy which pgp supported > I can be wrong about what exactly they talked about since it was long time ago so pardon me if thats the case, but are there any "issues" that you know about in age? Entropy bikeshedding is very popular for PGP…
I hate to break the narrative but age also supports RSA, for SSH compat:
Re: Building a Transparent Keyserver
#181. The monitoring client does not ensure that the checkpoint was created recently, so a malicious log can conceal malicious entries from monitors by serving an old checkpoint.
2. Though the age keyserver policy is not configured this way, the post suggests you could create a policy that requires only a minority of witnesses (e.g. 3 of 10) to cosign a checkpoint. If you do this, then monitors have to get checkpoints that are cosigned by at least 8 of the 10 witnesses. Otherwise, a malicious log could present one view to relying parties that is cosigned by one set of witnesses, and a different view to monitors that is cosigned by a different set of witnesses. There is currently no mechanism specified for monitors to get these extra cosignatures, so if you go with a minority policy you'll need to invent your own stuff in order for witnessing to actually accomplish anything.
Re: Building a Transparent Keyserver
#19There are a couple things missing from this: 1. The monitoring client does not ensure that the checkpoint was created recently, so a malicious log can conceal malicious entries from monitors by serving an old checkpoint. 2. Though the age keyserver policy is not configured this way, the post suggests you could create a policy that requires only a minority of witnesses (e.g. 3 of 10) to cosign a checkpoint. If you do…
I'll add a note to the part of the article that mentions non-majority policies.
Re: Building a Transparent Keyserver
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
> But I was discussing it with some techies once and someone mentioned to me that it had less entropy (I think they mentioned 256 bits of entropy) whereas they wanted 512 bits of entropy which pgp supported > I can be wrong about what exactly they talked about since it was long time ago so pardon me if thats the case, but are there any "issues" that you know about in age? Entropy bikeshedding is very popular for PGP…
> PGP supports RSA. That's enough reason to avoid it. I hate to break the narrative but age also supports RSA, for SSH compat: https://man.archlinux.org/man/age.1#SSH_keys