I tried jj a few times but it seems to be incompatible with my workflow. I tend to have lots of uncommitted files and changes that i want to keep around in this state while I move around branches and while having multiple change lists (jetbrains implementation) that I will commit at some point in time. This loose, flexible way of using git seems hard to do in jj.
Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
11–20 of 30 posts
Re: Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
#12I tried jj a few times but it seems to be incompatible with my workflow. I tend to have lots of uncommitted files and changes that i want to keep around in this state while I move around branches and while having multiple change lists (jetbrains implementation) that I will commit at some point in time. This loose, flexible way of using git seems hard to do in jj.
Some techniques for this are covered in: https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/FAQ/#how-can-i-keep-my-scratc... and https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/FAQ/#how-can-i-avoid-committi...
Re: Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
#13Re: Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
#14I tried jj a few times but it seems to be incompatible with my workflow. I tend to have lots of uncommitted files and changes that i want to keep around in this state while I move around branches and while having multiple change lists (jetbrains implementation) that I will commit at some point in time. This loose, flexible way of using git seems hard to do in jj.
I'd been concerned about that initially, but setting up some gitgnores made this a complete non problem for me. .scratch/ for a lot, *.scratch, and ig-*. It's also so easy to go back to the change latter and remove the files (after they're already copied elsewhere, or just operations log to go get) that it's really not a problem to just let stuff get in your commits. In git there's such a strong incentive to do thing…
There is no such. There are a lot of tools to manipulate commits and WIP, such as the stash, rebase, cherry pick, extracting and applying patch. You only need clean commits for review and the main branch because that helps the whole team. Your local copy can be as messy as you want to.
Re: Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
#15I tried jj a few times but it seems to be incompatible with my workflow. I tend to have lots of uncommitted files and changes that i want to keep around in this state while I move around branches and while having multiple change lists (jetbrains implementation) that I will commit at some point in time. This loose, flexible way of using git seems hard to do in jj.
Some techniques for this are covered in: https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/FAQ/#how-can-i-keep-my-scratc... and https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/FAQ/#how-can-i-avoid-committi...
Eg with stacked git (stg) this is just: goto, spill, and then refresh/create the stuff I want.
[0] https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/faq/#i-accidentally-changed-f...
Re: Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some techniques for this are covered in: https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/FAQ/#how-can-i-keep-my-scratc... and https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/FAQ/#how-can-i-avoid-committi...
The work needed for the “I included something in a commit I want split out” [0] seems really complex, and it is something I do often. Eg with stacked git (stg) this is just: goto, spill, and then refresh/create the stuff I want. [0] https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/faq/#i-accidentally-changed-f...
Re: Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
#17I didn't enjoy using JJ for the first day or two until I discovered jjui, now I do probably 95% of my interactions with jj through jjui.
Re: Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
#18I started to use JJ during the summer, and now I'm hooked. It feels much easier to do things such as reorder, squash and split commits, as well as change commit message.
pick 5340360 # First commit.
pick 12ccd8a # Second commit.
pick a2b6a59 # Fourth commit.
pick 2a648f2 # Commit #4.
pick 6bb5d98 # Commit #5.
pick af1f2fe # Commit #6.
pick 7e99e85 # Commit #7.
pick 7567b18 # Commit #8.
pick c23819d # Commit #9.
pick 50941da # Commit #10.
You edit it to (due to help don't really have to remember a single command): pick 5340360 # First commit.
pick a2b6a59 # Fourth commit.
pick 2a648f2 # Commit #4.
reword 12ccd8a # Second commit.
edit 6bb5d98 # Commit #5.
squash 7e99e85 # Commit #7.
pick af1f2fe # Commit #6.
squash 7567b18 # Commit #8.
drop c23819d # Commit #9.
pick 50941da # Commit #10.
And then after letting you reword 12ccd8a, edit 6bb5d98, write new messages for (post-edit) 6bb5d98&7e99e85, and af1f2fe&7567b18, you get: pick 5340360 # First commit.
pick 2448f03 # Fourth commit.
pick 9cefee3 # Commit #4.
pick 1259a52 # Second "Hi" commit.
pick 2ca48d8 # Commit #5.Commit #7.
pick 4bf7bcd # Commit #6.Commit #8.
pick dbbb733 # Commit #10.
And if you messed up anything, you can always undo it by using your `git reflog`. No matter what you did, you can always go back a previous state! Each state is stored as new commit. dbbb733 (HEAD -> master) HEAD@{18}: rebase (finish): returning to refs/heads/master
dbbb733 (HEAD -> master) HEAD@{19}: rebase (pick): Commit #10.
4bf7bcd HEAD@{20}: rebase (squash): Commit #6.Commit #8.
cdc47c1 HEAD@{21}: rebase (pick): Commit #6.
2ca48d8 HEAD@{22}: rebase (squash): Commit #5.Commit #7.
6a6fccc HEAD@{23}: commit (amend): Commit #5.
86ca5f8 HEAD@{24}: rebase (edit): Commit #5.
1259a52 HEAD@{25}: rebase (reword): Second "Hi" commit.
b33f89c HEAD@{26}: rebase (reword): Second commit.
9cefee3 HEAD@{27}: rebase (pick): Commit #4.
2448f03 HEAD@{28}: rebase (pick): Fourth commit.
5340360 HEAD@{29}: rebase: fast-forward
d1406ed HEAD@{30}: rebase (start): checkout d1406ed8145dc84695eb622bc6b3fc078e8098df
50941da HEAD@{31}: commit: Commit #10.
c23819d HEAD@{32}: commit: Commit #9.
7567b18 HEAD@{33}: commit: Commit #8.
7e99e85 HEAD@{34}: commit: Commit #7.
af1f2fe HEAD@{35}: commit: Commit #6.
6bb5d98 HEAD@{36}: commit: Commit #5.
2a648f2 HEAD@{37}: commit: Commit #4.
a2b6a59 HEAD@{38}: commit: Fourth commit.
12ccd8a HEAD@{39}: commit: Second commit.
5340360 HEAD@{40}: commit (initial): First commit.
Feel like git has a reputation for being hard even for things they're not that much.Re: Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
The work needed for the “I included something in a commit I want split out” [0] seems really complex, and it is something I do often. Eg with stacked git (stg) this is just: goto, spill, and then refresh/create the stuff I want. [0] https://docs.jj-vcs.dev/latest/faq/#i-accidentally-changed-f...
You can do that with just `jj split` too. The FAQ entry you linked to is for when you accidentally amended a commit and now you want to restore the bookmark to the old commit and move the changes you amended into a new commit on top instead.
Re: Awesome-Jj: Jujutsu Things
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can do that with just `jj split` too. The FAQ entry you linked to is for when you accidentally amended a commit and now you want to restore the bookmark to the old commit and move the changes you amended into a new commit on top instead.
Sounds like "git reset" to me. Not sure, if it is, but this sounds to be easier in git.
`git reset` by itself doesn't split a commit AFAIK. You need to then `git add -p` and `git commit` (and recover the commit message from the old commit). And what happens if you had other changes in the working copy first? Or if you want to split a commit that's not at HEAD?