Some more discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46239009
Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
11–20 of 288 posts
Re: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
#12In a parallel universe, the government in the 20th century signed bills protecting tobacco giants from State regulation to encourage investments furthering the country’s international competitiveness in the tobacco industry.
Re: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
#13True current title: Trump signs executive order aimed at preventing states from regulating AI
Re: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
#14> Earlier this week, he reiterated that sentiment in a post on Truth Social, saying: “We are beating ALL COUNTRIES at this point in the race, but that won’t last long if we are going to have 50 States, many of them bad actors
Has Trump IDed the alleged bad actor states?
Re: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
#15> Earlier this week, he reiterated that sentiment in a post on Truth Social, saying: “We are beating ALL COUNTRIES at this point in the race, but that won’t last long if we are going to have 50 States, many of them bad actors Has Trump IDed the alleged bad actor states?
It’s hard to tell if what he says is even relate to what he will do. A hardline on semiconductors to China faded this week when he needed some economic stimulation.
So when states without AI data centers seek to ameliorate tax and zoning obstacles, it won’t be Federal preemption in their way, but what benefits Trump.
Re: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
#16In a parallel universe, the government in the 20th century signed bills protecting tobacco giants from State regulation to encourage investments furthering the country’s international competitiveness in the tobacco industry.
That does kind of draw a contrast between Jesse Helms, the ultimate tobacco Senator, and Trump. They’re almost opposites.
Re: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
#17> Republicans earlier this year failed to pass a similar 10-year moratorium on state laws that regulate AI as part of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, with the Senate voting 99-1 to remove that ban from the legislation. Trump’s order resurrects that effort, which failed after bipartisan pushback and Republican infighting, but as an order that lacks the force of law. [0]
> Trump has framed the need for comprehensive AI regulation as both a necessity for the technology’s development and as a means of preventing leftist ideology from infiltrating generative AI – a common conservative grievance among tech leaders such as Elon Musk.
On the other hand ..... Grok and others ...
From the party of "states rights" and "small government"
[0] https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/policy-topics/d...
Re: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
#18Some more discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46239009
We'll merge that thread hither.
Re: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
#19I wish this article would include what the details of the framework are. It’s unhelpful in its current form.
We've since changed the URL to link to the order itself, and put links to other articles in the toptext.
Re: Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence
#20Executive order (EO) count over the last few presidents: * Bush (41): 166 * Clinton (two terms): 364 * Bush (43; two terms): 291 * Obama (two terms): 276 * Trump (45): 220 * Biden: 162 * Trump (47; Source: * https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/executive-or... Someone commented that (one of?) the reason that Trump is using EOs so much is probably because is not willing (or able) to actually get deals on in…
Or why bother when no one will stop you from ruling by fiat?