11–20 of 35 posts
> Even recently, Musk fought back against the notion that Tesla relies on teleoperation for its Optimus demonstration. He specified that a new demo of Optimus doing kung-fu was “AI, not tele-operated” The world's biggest liar, possibly. It's insane to me that laws and regulations haven't stopped him from lying to investors and the public, but that's the world in which we live.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah yes, Think of the children! [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children
No. This is a real issue. If a robot is fully AI powered and doing what it does fully autonomously, then it has a very different risk profile compared to a teleoperated robot. For example, you can be fairly certain that given the current state of AI tech, an AI powered robot has no innate desire to creep on your kids, while a teleoperated robot could very well be operated remotely by a pedophile who is watching your…
But nonetheless I was pointing out that using the "Think of the children" as an argument is a push to emotions rather than a more rational thinking.
These will be hazardous to children.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. This is a real issue. If a robot is fully AI powered and doing what it does fully autonomously, then it has a very different risk profile compared to a teleoperated robot. For example, you can be fairly certain that given the current state of AI tech, an AI powered robot has no innate desire to creep on your kids, while a teleoperated robot could very well be operated remotely by a pedophile who is watching your…
I actually agree with you on this. I think those robots are going to be a huge danger for society and everyone (not only children). But nonetheless I was pointing out that using the "Think of the children" as an argument is a push to emotions rather than a more rational thinking.
> Even recently, Musk fought back against the notion that Tesla relies on teleoperation for its Optimus demonstration. He specified that a new demo of Optimus doing kung-fu was “AI, not tele-operated” The world's biggest liar, possibly. It's insane to me that laws and regulations haven't stopped him from lying to investors and the public, but that's the world in which we live.
The FCC would have a whole lot to say if he was lying about something like that at a publicly traded company.
The SEC didn't even enforce the whole he can't run his twitter account punishment for tweeting that he took TSLA private at 420.
All observations about teleoperation aside, it's just really funny to me how the robot appears to knock over the water bottles, throw its hands up in exasperation, and then give up and fall down. It somehow makes it feel more human.
umm, so ignoring it was operated by a human it acted surprisingly human like? :)
Fred Lambert's blogs about Tesla are always critical and have been proven wrong many times. I would take it with a pinch of salt.
Like many many times..
Genuinely like to spot what I missed
> Even recently, Musk fought back against the notion that Tesla relies on teleoperation for its Optimus demonstration. He specified that a new demo of Optimus doing kung-fu was “AI, not tele-operated” The world's biggest liar, possibly. It's insane to me that laws and regulations haven't stopped him from lying to investors and the public, but that's the world in which we live.
All observations about teleoperation aside, it's just really funny to me how the robot appears to knock over the water bottles, throw its hands up in exasperation, and then give up and fall down. It somehow makes it feel more human.
1. Build robots to change the narrative around overpriced stock for EV company
2. Align with right wing politicians to eliminate illegal immigration.
3. If AI for robotics is solved, congrats, you eliminated the competition.
4. If AI doesn't pan out, congrats, all the firms relying on illegal immigrants can now buy your robots and have those same illegal immigrants teleoperate the robots from their home countries.
Its like win win for amoral broligarchy