Live data from Hacker News

IBM to acquire Confluent

confluent.io

11–20 of 374 posts

Re: IBM to acquire Confluent

#11
Genuine question: how did the IBM acquisitions of Red Hat and HashiCorp turn out?

For Red Hat, there's no longer an official "public" distribution of RHEL, but apart from that they seemingly have been left alone and able to continue to develop their own products. But that's only my POV as a user of OSS Red Hat products at home and of RHEL and OpenShift at work.

Re: IBM to acquire Confluent

#16

is it good or bad for confluent employees?

From experience, and to slightly refute the sibling replied, good for the confluent peeps that get flagged as being essential to the acquisition, they'll get a retention bonus of 100-300% of base pay spread over three years. The cutting of staff will begin likely in the 3-5 year time frame.

Re: IBM to acquire Confluent

#18

Genuine question: how did the IBM acquisitions of Red Hat and HashiCorp turn out? For Red Hat, there's no longer an official "public" distribution of RHEL, but apart from that they seemingly have been left alone and able to continue to develop their own products. But that's only my POV as a user of OSS Red Hat products at home and of RHEL and OpenShift at work.

Gnome has stagnated significantly.

Re: IBM to acquire Confluent

#19

is it good or bad for confluent employees?

It depends a lot on which org they go into, and the motivations of the P&L owner of that division.

IBM is a really big and diverse company, in a way fundamentally different from most other big tech. In a sense, it is completely incoherent to refer to them as a singular entity.

My opinions are my own. I worked at IBM like a decade ago in a role where I could see the radically different motivations of divisions.

Post reply on HN