For Red Hat, there's no longer an official "public" distribution of RHEL, but apart from that they seemingly have been left alone and able to continue to develop their own products. But that's only my POV as a user of OSS Red Hat products at home and of RHEL and OpenShift at work.
IBM to acquire Confluent
11–20 of 374 posts
Re: IBM to acquire Confluent
#12And the enshittification treadmill continues. Great time to be a kafka alternative. I'll start. https://github.com/tansu-io/tansu
Re: IBM to acquire Confluent
#13Re: IBM to acquire Confluent
#14Re: IBM to acquire Confluent
#15Re: IBM to acquire Confluent
#16is it good or bad for confluent employees?
Re: IBM to acquire Confluent
#17Re: IBM to acquire Confluent
#18Genuine question: how did the IBM acquisitions of Red Hat and HashiCorp turn out? For Red Hat, there's no longer an official "public" distribution of RHEL, but apart from that they seemingly have been left alone and able to continue to develop their own products. But that's only my POV as a user of OSS Red Hat products at home and of RHEL and OpenShift at work.
Re: IBM to acquire Confluent
#19is it good or bad for confluent employees?
IBM is a really big and diverse company, in a way fundamentally different from most other big tech. In a sense, it is completely incoherent to refer to them as a singular entity.
My opinions are my own. I worked at IBM like a decade ago in a role where I could see the radically different motivations of divisions.