Live data from Hacker News

EU hits X with €120M fine for breaching the Digital Services Act

dw.com

11–20 of 97 posts

Re: EU hits X with €120M fine for breaching the Digital Services Act

#11
post #7

They changed the blue check from an exclusive club of the rich and popular, to just Ive got a paying account. How is that misleading? Why does the EU have a say about design choices?

The blue check symbolised (symbolises) being verified, i.e. this account belongs to who it says it does. But it doesn't carry out any/sufficient checks to actually verify that.

See also: https://x.com/jesus/status/1590405986925543424

Re: EU hits X with €120M fine for breaching the Digital Services Act

#12
post #6

Why can a company be fined for not allowing "researchers" access to data? That seems bizarre to me.

What's bizarre about it? There's lots of legislation that requires companies to report on various data or to provide access to auditors. It's legally valid.

I think there's a compelling case to be made for requiring large social media platforms to provide data access to researchers, considering the platform's incredible ability to influence elections and society at-large.

Re: EU hits X with €120M fine for breaching the Digital Services Act

#13
post #6

Why can a company be fined for not allowing "researchers" access to data? That seems bizarre to me.

It's not "any company", it's exceptionally large platforms who can give insight into large societal questions and have enough influence to sway people's opinions. The data is technically public already, researchers could scrape it, but investigations has to be able to be done to ensure the platforms aren't used to intentionally steer people's opinion in a specific direction, since they're unable to self regulate that it seems.

Re: EU hits X with €120M fine for breaching the Digital Services Act

#15
post #2

> "Europe is taxing Americans to subsidize a continent held back by Europe’s own suffocating regulations," Carr said. And America is taxing Americans via tariffs to subsidize a corrupt executive branch lining its own pockets. At least Europe is looking out for a whole continent. Not just a handful of grifters.

Europe does tax its people a lot more. So the argument doesn't make sense.

Re: EU hits X with €120M fine for breaching the Digital Services Act

#16

I mean, is there really any reason to continue offering the service in Europe? I highly doubt the revenue is really worth the trouble.

It’s not for profit. Elon put 45 billion dollars into it as a vehicle to influence even more people of the world particularly politicians.

His open stance and clear support or rebuke of various political figures and parties around the world is a clear indication of this.

Re: EU hits X with €120M fine for breaching the Digital Services Act

#17
post #15
post #2

> "Europe is taxing Americans to subsidize a continent held back by Europe’s own suffocating regulations," Carr said. And America is taxing Americans via tariffs to subsidize a corrupt executive branch lining its own pockets. At least Europe is looking out for a whole continent. Not just a handful of grifters.

Europe does tax its people a lot more. So the argument doesn't make sense.

Taxes which are used wisely for the people’s benefit is not a wasteful thing. That was the point original commentator made.

Your reasoning is that taxation is always bad and the more you pay the worst, a very American view which I can understand given how badly US government spends money in this regard.

Re: EU hits X with €120M fine for breaching the Digital Services Act

#18
post #6

Why can a company be fined for not allowing "researchers" access to data? That seems bizarre to me.

A lot of people seem to be forgetting that the Cambridge Analytica scandal started off with data that was supposed to be used for research projects at the University of Cambridge being exfiltrated for commercial political use [0].

That said, this is most likely a tit-for-tat by the EU against the Trump administration, because we live in a world where all countries (even the US) have now weaponized regulations for negotiating leverage.

Our red line in both the Biden admin as well as the current admin was the DSA. The EU's red line is not being included in any negotiation over the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. The US fights against the DSA by arguing about infringement on free speech. The EU then tries to fight back over market competition. And it goes on and on and on.

This is why a lot of businesses get antsy about trade wars.

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Ana...

Re: EU hits X with €120M fine for breaching the Digital Services Act

#20
post #7

They changed the blue check from an exclusive club of the rich and popular, to just Ive got a paying account. How is that misleading? Why does the EU have a say about design choices?

The blue check symbolised (symbolises) being verified, i.e. this account belongs to who it says it does. But it doesn't carry out any/sufficient checks to actually verify that. See also: https://x.com/jesus/status/1590405986925543424

Twitter created that definition and now the EU has the divine right to not let them change it? Verified can and does mean many things.
Post reply on HN