This is quite cool, seeing taking off planes appearing and rising is cool. Some comments: - Is the Up axis correctly scaled? The ascent rate of planes taking off seems very steep - Planes landing seems to get "stuck" at the beginning of a lane at about 600 feet (tracking/radar cutoff?), maybe a fix the that slightly adjusts it to ground in a landed state if a plane "stops" or disappears from the data tracking.
Down at the bottom of the menu there's an altitude scale slider. It defaults to 1.2, changing it to 1.0 makes the trails look better.
Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
11–20 of 108 posts
Re: Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
#12I’m so glad that many of you like this app. I’m a solo dev, actively building between my 9-5 and raising a 9mo.
Please follow along on X https://x.com/benlimner, or join the mailing list for updates/suggestions!
Re: Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
#13I love this, and would pay for native or electron app on Mac. Like Google Earth for global airspace.
Re: Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Down at the bottom of the menu there's an altitude scale slider. It defaults to 1.2, changing it to 1.0 makes the trails look better.
It's amusing that changing the altitude scale doesn't reset the "trails" -- when I dragged it around quickly (on mobile) it left vertical streaks behind all the in-flight planes
Re: Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
#15This is really freaking cool. Two asks - (1) you should default to a busy airport, eg. Atlanta, which is the busiest in the world. They have an order of magnitude more flights landing and departing. It seems random, but I keep getting New Orleans which is 10-20x less busy than Atlanta. ATL, SFO, LAX, ... That said, the topographically diverse places like Anchorage are nice too, and the height maps on the textures are…
You’re getting New Orleans because it’s truly selecting from ~20 random US airports.
Stoked that you like the app!
Re: Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
interesting, seems to be random. I've gotten Portland which was also not too busy but nevertheless enough to understand the beauty of it.
This thing is dangerous. It's going to nerd snipe me into a new hobby. https://imgur.com/a/264P9Q4 It looks completely accurate. I could see the medivac helicopters taking off, and it matched 1:1. I missed a biplane flying over the city. And some other low-flying planes circling mysteriously. If I had a telephoto lens and a way to alert myself of large planes flying low (happens frequently), C-130s, F-22s, etc. I thi…
I’m looking into adding better data providers so there are fewer missing planes.
Re: Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
#17This is really freaking cool. Two asks - (1) you should default to a busy airport, eg. Atlanta, which is the busiest in the world. They have an order of magnitude more flights landing and departing. It seems random, but I keep getting New Orleans which is 10-20x less busy than Atlanta. ATL, SFO, LAX, ... That said, the topographically diverse places like Anchorage are nice too, and the height maps on the textures are…
interesting, seems to be random. I've gotten Portland which was also not too busy but nevertheless enough to understand the beauty of it.
If there’s an airport you want to default to, search for it and save the URL
Re: Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
#18Wow, great idea well executed, congrats
Re: Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
#19As a bit of a Flight Aware addict, well done.
Re: Airloom – 3D Flight Tracker
#20As a bit of a Flight Aware addict, well done.
Curious, what would make you default to this tool over FA?
While your site is pretty cool, it's more of a neat thing to look at than it is a useful tool like Flightaware. That said, I bookmarked it and will visit it often (probably) as I live near an airport and can see planes in the distance. Also, I second the request for higher-resolution map tiles.