Live data from Hacker News

EU Council approves Chat Control mandate for negotiation with Parliament

techradar.com

11–20 of 163 posts

Re: EU Council approves Chat Control mandate for negotiation with Parliament

#13
post #5

Seems… fine? At least i dont see any invasion of privacy or encryption related obligations in this proposal. The EU ostensibly wants to improve innovation, i wonder how these new assessment regulations help with that, especially for SME and startups.

"High risk" providers will be obligated to "contribute" technologies "to mitigate." Seems like a doublespeak way of saying enforced decryption or enforced backdoors.

Yes, I see this as the people pushing for surveillance and control taking what they can get for now, with the view to bring it back to mandatory scanning before all is said and done.

Re: EU Council approves Chat Control mandate for negotiation with Parliament

#14
Honest question. The EU was created as an economic and trade institution. How has it morphed into a wierd political institution, which NATO was already supposed to be?

The root question: how did an organization that ushered in things like the Euro become a body that decides whether Europeans are allowed to have personal privacy?

Re: EU Council approves Chat Control mandate for negotiation with Parliament

#15
post #5

Seems… fine? At least i dont see any invasion of privacy or encryption related obligations in this proposal. The EU ostensibly wants to improve innovation, i wonder how these new assessment regulations help with that, especially for SME and startups.

"High risk" providers will be obligated to "contribute" technologies "to mitigate." Seems like a doublespeak way of saying enforced decryption or enforced backdoors.

It's one of those things that will obviously be used to boil the frog over time via beurocratic rules.

Year 1 a minimum viable effort manual process will be fine. But they'll say "not good enough" to someone every now and then and the minimum can do in order to get a) permission b) enforcers not crawling up your ass (IDK if it will be permission based or enforcement after the fact based) will ratchet up.

By year 10 or 20 "everyone" will have an API or a portal or whatever.

And worse, by creating a compliance industry they create a whole suite of business and people who will ask for more, more, more more.

Re: EU Council approves Chat Control mandate for negotiation with Parliament

#16

Honest question. The EU was created as an economic and trade institution. How has it morphed into a wierd political institution, which NATO was already supposed to be? The root question: how did an organization that ushered in things like the Euro become a body that decides whether Europeans are allowed to have personal privacy?

> The EU was created as an economic and trade institution. How has it morphed into a wierd political institution, which NATO was already supposed to be?

That is not the case.

The 1957 Treaty Establishing the European Community contained the objective of “ever closer union” in the following words in the Preamble. In English this is: “Determined to lay the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe …..”.

> The root question: how did an organization that ushered in things like the Euro become a body that decides whether Europeans are allowed to have personal privacy?

Sensationalist framing aside, how does any government become a body that decides anything?

Re: EU Council approves Chat Control mandate for negotiation with Parliament

#17

Honest question. The EU was created as an economic and trade institution. How has it morphed into a wierd political institution, which NATO was already supposed to be? The root question: how did an organization that ushered in things like the Euro become a body that decides whether Europeans are allowed to have personal privacy?

> The EU was created as an economic and trade institution. How has it morphed into a wierd political institution, which NATO was already supposed to be? That is not the case. The 1957 Treaty Establishing the European Community contained the objective of “ever closer union” in the following words in the Preamble. In English this is: “Determined to lay the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe…

That treaty was established just over a decade after Hitler surrendered, when there were two Germanys, an Iron curtain across Europe, and a lot of other things which changed significantly after the Wall fell. Surely you would agree that those words meant something quite different then than they do now?

I don't think my framing was sensationalist at all. Chat Control is using the threat of child porn to make people forget the reasons why the ECHR cares so deeply about privacy. I'm not sure why Denmark is pushing it so hard, but governments have long feared and hated encryption.

Re: EU Council approves Chat Control mandate for negotiation with Parliament

#18
I am ashamed to be Danish. Where are the mass protests of hundreds of thousands, the mass walkouts from our workplaces until our government at last respects our human dignity?

Our government has today turned the EU into a tool for total surveillance I don't know if there can be any return from. Our democratic processes have been abused, and our politicians shown to be nothing but craven, self-interested agents of control.

Re: EU Council approves Chat Control mandate for negotiation with Parliament

#19

I am ashamed to be Danish. Where are the mass protests of hundreds of thousands, the mass walkouts from our workplaces until our government at last respects our human dignity? Our government has today turned the EU into a tool for total surveillance I don't know if there can be any return from. Our democratic processes have been abused, and our politicians shown to be nothing but craven, self-interested agents of con…

What about going out in front of your city hall with a poster saying no-chat-control?

You risk nothing, do you?

Re: EU Council approves Chat Control mandate for negotiation with Parliament

#20

Honest question. The EU was created as an economic and trade institution. How has it morphed into a wierd political institution, which NATO was already supposed to be? The root question: how did an organization that ushered in things like the Euro become a body that decides whether Europeans are allowed to have personal privacy?

ever closer union in the Treaty of Rome

the entire point is to build a country called Europe

and the EU is built on the "Monnet method", where it slowly ratchets forward taking more power from national parliaments and giving it to the EU council/commission

(with a useless parliament there to make it appear democratic)

the UK leaving is the only example of the ratchet being reversed

Post reply on HN