> This is not a real choice made by citizens This is something which courts should consider more about other things, such as EULA and Terms and Conditions. Same reasons.
The choice citizens would make every single time is to see the website without ads. Of course, publishers aren’t happy about that, since they would have to close shop. Maybe the EC should consider both sides of the equation.
Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
11–20 of 99 posts
Re: Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
#12the problem is a plugin like that would take out entire industries because it would basically end anonymous tracking cookies.
Re: Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
#13> This is not a real choice made by citizens This is something which courts should consider more about other things, such as EULA and Terms and Conditions. Same reasons.
The choice citizens would make every single time is to see the website without ads. Of course, publishers aren’t happy about that, since they would have to close shop. Maybe the EC should consider both sides of the equation.
Re: Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
#14This was the correct decision and could have been made a decade ago. An .. institutional deficiency was trying to make the GDPR as completely general as possible rather than doing a technology mandate. But this had two consequences: bad actors could circumvent it, and good actors just trying to comply ended up horribly confused (e.g. is logging an IP address in an Apache log "personal data"?). DNT header. Legally bin…
Re: Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
#15Re: Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
#16Locking up a few people who don't respect their users' privacy would be a much more effective way of achieving actual results. AFAIK no big adtech or data brokers have been punished in any way.
Re: Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
#17They are proudly removing the annoyance they mandated 7 tears ago.
Do we have to congratulate them?
Re: Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
#18Re: Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
#19GDPR itself doesn't require consent for functional cookies. For example, Apple.com does not have a cookie consent box _at all_.
On tracking specifically, I feel there are at least two levels. One that happens in-browser by third party companies. These are your classic advertisements. The other is more first-party backend-heavy. These would be your local grocery store using your purchase history linked to your membership card and using that data to create analytics and targeted ads etc.
So creating a browser setting would likely not toggle all tracking away, just the ones that are "annoying" while browsing.
Re: Europe's cookie nightmare is crumbling. EC wants preference at browser level
#20Things like "precise location information stored for 12 years": https://x.com/dmitriid/status/1817122117093056541
Europe literally said: we're not going to force specific tech decisions on you. All we ask is to let people opt-in if they want to be tracked. What we got is "we care about your privacy, we're sending all your data to 15000 partners" from the industry.
To people crying "but this should've been mandated as a browser setting": Which world's largest advertising company has dominating browser marketshare and subsumes all web standards committees? What exactly prevented that company to come up with a browser setting that isn't "we sell your data by default and use dark patterns to trick you to agree" https://x.com/dmitriid/status/1664682689591377923?
Our industry is shit, and we blame governments for regulations that ... assume that industries shouldn't be shit. There's literally no need for EU to regulate browser settings. And yet here we are.