11–20 of 110 posts
[flagged]
Just what we need. They stopped Nuclear energy from taking over in the 70s and 80s, why not destroy Air travel too?
I mean they would still be using drones but the drones are just human.
Suddenly wondering if there is any history of Russians/Soviets “sponsoring” the groups who were after Germany shutting down its nuclear reactors…
Not a bad overview of the situation! Worth it for some of the questions about what is actually efficient and not just technically effective. Especially at this scale. > "The aggressor", he concludes, "will observe, adjust, repeat – until they get through". Reminds me a lot of digital sec.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you really think after years of crushing defeats in battle and sanctions, that they have the money or soldiers to fight the EU? If they did, they would have taken over Ukraine by now. Now if China gets involved? It's a different story.
They don't need money or soldiers, but drones.
Every news report I read about this stuff has at best /r/ufos level of uselessly vague photography.
If we see a war between Russia and the EU, we're going to have to deal with them learning from Israel and using the same idea of decentralised drone hubs attacking military and civilian targets across the entire continent. We're woefully underprepared to deal with something like this. Western Europe still thinks that if a war breaks out, it'll be tanks and soldiers going into the Baltic states, and we'll crush them w…
Do you really think after years of crushing defeats in battle and sanctions, that they have the money or soldiers to fight the EU? If they did, they would have taken over Ukraine by now. Now if China gets involved? It's a different story.
[flagged]
Right, because nothing screams "I love the environment" like replacing one five hour flight with 200 48 hour internal combustion car road trips.
[0] https://terrapass.com/blog/carbon-footprint-of-driving-vs-fl...