Works pretty well for gdzig
AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
11–20 of 132 posts
Re: AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
#12Works pretty well for gdzig https://deepwiki.com/gdzig/gdzig/1-overview
Hi! Cool to see you commenting here, great work on gdzig btw :)
Re: AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
#13Re: AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
#14I tried a few different repositories (both my own and various other people’s projects). They all yield the same: No repositories found No repositories matching "https://git.sr.ht/~whynothugo/ImapGoose" were found. Probably broken/down right now?
Maybe they only support github?
Re: AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
#15I insta-banned this site in Kagi. The trigger for me: utter disrespect for the user with unhideable glassy floating chatbox at the bottom of the page. And WTF with these floating boxes popping up everywhere?!? They are tailor-made to trigger anxiety in people with OCD. They look like a notification that keep grabbing your attention as you scroll the text. Example: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/secure-eks-clusters-…
Help yourself with https://secure.fanboy.co.nz/fanboy-annoyance.txt or one of its variants.
Re: AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
#16I took a look at a project I maintain[0], and wow. It's so wrong in every section I saw. The generated diagrams make no sense. The text sections take implementation details that don't matter and present them to the user like they need to know them. It's also outdated.
I hope actual users never see this. I dread thinking about having to go around to various LLM generated sites to correct documentation I never approved of to stop confusing users that are tricked into reading it.
Re: AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
#17This worked well for me for some things I've recently been learning/working on. One improvement I'd add is the citations of where information have come from aren't hyperlinks it would be very useful if they were!
Re: AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
#18I took a look at a project I maintain[0], and wow. It's so wrong in every section I saw. The generated diagrams make no sense. The text sections take implementation details that don't matter and present them to the user like they need to know them. It's also outdated. I hope actual users never see this. I dread thinking about having to go around to various LLM generated sites to correct documentation I never approved…
> The text sections take implementation details that don't matter and present them to the user like they need to know them.
Yeah this seems to be a recurring issue on each of the repos I've tried. Some occasionally useful tables or diagrams buried in pages of distracting irrelevant slop.
Re: AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
#19I took a look at a project I maintain[0], and wow. It's so wrong in every section I saw. The generated diagrams make no sense. The text sections take implementation details that don't matter and present them to the user like they need to know them. It's also outdated. I hope actual users never see this. I dread thinking about having to go around to various LLM generated sites to correct documentation I never approved…
I fear the consequences will be even darker:
- Users are confused by autogenerated docs and don’t even want to try using a project because of it
- Real curated project documentation is no longer corrected by users feedback (because they never reach it)
- LLMs are trained on wrong autogenerated documentation: a downward spiral for hallucinations! (Maybe this one could then force users go look for the official docs? But not sure at this point…)
Re: AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo
#20I took a look at a project I maintain[0], and wow. It's so wrong in every section I saw. The generated diagrams make no sense. The text sections take implementation details that don't matter and present them to the user like they need to know them. It's also outdated. I hope actual users never see this. I dread thinking about having to go around to various LLM generated sites to correct documentation I never approved…
This is made by “Devin” I believe.