Live data from Hacker News

Redmond, WA, turns off Flock Safety cameras after ICE arrests

seattletimes.com

11–20 of 470 posts

Re: Redmond, WA, turns off Flock Safety cameras after ICE arrests

#13
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’d start by being ticked off that my city was burning money deploying a cloud-connected mass surveillance apparatus.

Until someone you love gets abducted, and then you want them to be found right now .

Until the government decides someone you love needs to get disappeared, and then you want to provide no aid to them.

This technology swings both ways and as such is too dangerous to exist. We have plenty of other means to instantly and broadly raise awareness about abductions.

Re: Redmond, WA, turns off Flock Safety cameras after ICE arrests

#14

[flagged]

Flock doesn't fight crime, it documents the travel of people without a reason.

It and other ALPR systems real-time alert on things like stolen cars. In my home county they have arrested and convicted criminals due to this. That is fighting crime, by definition.

If it was such a bad idea, they shouldn't have installed them in Redmond. Turning them off now because some people assumed things that weren't true is idiocy and sets a bad precedent.

Re: Redmond, WA, turns off Flock Safety cameras after ICE arrests

#20

[flagged]

on the books immigration law has been broken for decades. do you expect people across the border wait a decade to get their turn for an immigration interview only to be turned down, when they can just cross the border?

When laws become impractical, they create 11 million law breakers.

Post reply on HN