Live data from Hacker News

Sequoia COO quit over Shaun Maguire's comments about Mamdani

ft.com

11–20 of 143 posts

Re: Sequoia COO quit over Shaun Maguire's comments about Mamdani

#11
Maguire said that Mamdani "comes from a culture that lies about everything. It's literally a virtue to lie if it advances his Islamist agenda. The West will learn this lesson the hard way."

Maguire is a MAGA supporter, so the projection of lying is... interesting.

Re: Sequoia COO quit over Shaun Maguire's comments about Mamdani

#13

For all of the worship these guys get for being mega geniuses, they sure say a lot of ignorant shit.

If we're talking about Sequoia, I think you'd be hard-pressed to find something more entertaining than this fawning puff piece on Sam Bankman-Fried https://web.archive.org/web/20221027181005/https://www.sequo... Highlights: https://www.reddit.com/r/Buttcoin/comments/101sjn2/imagine_b...

The real problem is that Sequioa is so well regarded, and they control so much money, it is really hard to criticize them. You could say, you have options as an public LP, but you also don’t.

Re: Sequoia COO quit over Shaun Maguire's comments about Mamdani

#16
I'm not sure this direct departure matters that much to Sequoia. The COO Balbale was an operating partner who was CMO of Sequoia for 2 years and then COO for another 2 years and to my understanding did not write checks. The real elephant in the room question was whether Balbale was in a role getting carry or not. If not, then that effectively isn't different from an incentive level than an associate with a higher salary (but no real skin in the game). If so, then that means that carry was actually given up and it probably means more.

In contrast, Maguire (like other partners at Sequoia who are actually writing checks) has skin in the game through the checks he writes and whether they pan out or they don't. In light of that, setting aside his views (which you may agree or disagree with politically), I view his controversy as being most likely a calculated marketing maneuver to improve or maximize the signal to noise in his deal flow. It's hard for me as an outsider to say whether that's working for him or not, but his track record suggests that he's not having problems with his deal flow as a result.

That said -- the material comment at the end of the article does make a lot of sense. While this departure may not affect Sequoia that much, Maguire's position may sour many of the Middle East sovereign wealth funds that form some of the largest parts of Sequoia's LP base. If their discontent with Maguire's rhetoric ends up being more important to them than Sequoia's returns, that may well pose a far more material issue to Sequoia and they will be forced to act.

Re: Sequoia COO quit over Shaun Maguire's comments about Mamdani

#18
> Maguire, an outspoken and high-profile investor who is close to Elon Musk, wrote on X in July that New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani “comes from a culture that lies about everything. It’s literally a virtue to lie if it advances his Islamist agenda. The West will learn this lesson the hard way.” Balbale complained to other senior partners at the firm, who declined to take action against Maguire, arguing he was just exercising his right to free speech, the people said. She left soon after, feeling her position was untenable.

If the same quote replaced 'Islamist' with another faith, would it have also been brushed off as "right to free speech"?

Post reply on HN