It successfully got through the captcha at https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/demo
probably because its ip is coming from googles own subnet
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
11–20 of 339 posts
Re: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
#12Have average Google developers been told/hinted that their bonuses/promotions will be tied to their proactivity in using Gemini for project work?
Re: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
#13I've had good success with the Chrome devtools MCP ( https://github.com/ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp ) for browser automation with Gemini CLI, so I'm guessing this model will work even better.
This has absolutely nothing in common with a model for computer use... This uses pre-defined tools provided in the MCP server by Google, nothing to do with a general model supposed to work for any software.
Re: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
#14Re: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
#15doesn't seem like it makes sense to train AI around human user interfaces which aren't really efficient. It is like building a mechanical horse.
Re: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
#16Have average Google developers been told/hinted that their bonuses/promotions will be tied to their proactivity in using Gemini for project work?
> bonuses/promotions
more like continued employment.
Re: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
#17Have average Google developers been told/hinted that their bonuses/promotions will be tied to their proactivity in using Gemini for project work?
I know there was a memo telling Googlers they are expected to use AI at work and it’s expected for their performance to increase as a result.
Re: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
#18This will never hit a production enterprise system without some form of hooks/callbacks in place to instill governance.
Obviously much harder with UI vs agent events similar to the below.
Re: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
#19doesn't seem like it makes sense to train AI around human user interfaces which aren't really efficient. It is like building a mechanical horse.
Right, let's make APIs for everything...
[Looks around and sees people not making APIs for everything]
Well that didn't work.
Re: Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model
#20doesn't seem like it makes sense to train AI around human user interfaces which aren't really efficient. It is like building a mechanical horse.
It's not about efficiency but access. Many services do not provide programmatic access.