Keeping it real with the commit msgs
I much prefer this over those AI generated commit messages that just say "refactored X" every single commit.
Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
11–20 of 176 posts
Re: Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
#12Re: Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
#13This was discussed before at the time the PR was created and there's nothing new that I can see. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44530581
Re: Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
#14Someone really needs to learn to use `git commit --amend`. Almost 100 commits with pointless commit messages like "wip" or "x"? Be kinder to your reviewers...
Re: Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
#15Keeping it real with the commit msgs
Re: Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
#16Someone really needs to learn to use `git commit --amend`. Almost 100 commits with pointless commit messages like "wip" or "x"? Be kinder to your reviewers...
and git commit --fixup git rebase -i --autosquash
Re: Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
#17https://web.archive.org/web/20230929180112/https://techrepor...
https://web.archive.org/web/20011108190056/https://hardocp.c...
https://web.archive.org/web/20011118183932/www.3dcenter.de/a...
Re: Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
and git commit --fixup git rebase -i --autosquash
Claude, look at this git history, analyse diffs and create an intelligent commit message to replace each commit message. Do a rebase to fix it all up.
Re: Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
#19Re: Fp8 runs ~100 tflops faster when the kernel name has "cutlass" in it
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Claude, look at this git history, analyse diffs and create an intelligent commit message to replace each commit message. Do a rebase to fix it all up.
Would you actually do that? It's information destruction. You can machine generate at any time, but you can only delete the human input once