Why didn't GitHub come up with this? This seems like such an obvious use case.
Fossabot: AI code review for Dependabot/Renovate on breaking changes and impacts
11–19 of 19 posts
GitHub PM here. We have tried this, but we weren't able to get results that we were satisfied with. Of course, you have to revisit these things regularly, as the models and wider state of the art are evolving so quickly!
Re: Fossabot: AI code review for Dependabot/Renovate on breaking changes and impacts
#12Re: Fossabot: AI code review for Dependabot/Renovate on breaking changes and impacts
#13Fossabot[0] is also the name of an established Twitch/YouTube chat bot.
Re: Fossabot: AI code review for Dependabot/Renovate on breaking changes and impacts
#14Cool to see this coming out of FOSSA (ex FOSSA here :))
Re: Fossabot: AI code review for Dependabot/Renovate on breaking changes and impacts
#15This seems great, i see you offer it as a service, but also its opensource (FOSS) ... how does the FOSS version differ from the commercial service?
Re: Fossabot: AI code review for Dependabot/Renovate on breaking changes and impacts
#16Why didn't GitHub come up with this? This seems like such an obvious use case.
Because this won't work. Dependency updates are actually incredibly hard.
Re: Fossabot: AI code review for Dependabot/Renovate on breaking changes and impacts
#17Did they not Google the name before deciding upon it? Fossabot is a dominant player in online streaming chat moderation.
Re: Fossabot: AI code review for Dependabot/Renovate on breaking changes and impacts
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
GitHub hasn't done anything interesting with dependabot or code scanning for awhile.
They're spending all of their engineering resources on not doing anything interesting with Copilot instead.
And not solving lots of small issues listed on... GitHub. The community project is such an issues graveyard.
Re: Fossabot: AI code review for Dependabot/Renovate on breaking changes and impacts
#19This seems great, i see you offer it as a service, but also its opensource (FOSS) ... how does the FOSS version differ from the commercial service?
> also its opensource (FOSS)
Where did you see that? I must've missed it in the announcement