11–20 of 25 posts
It's clear every site on the internet without id checks (and even those who do check id since people can lie) are accessed by minors, I'm not sure what they expect.
And while they're at it, they should take a look at the data that Google collects from kids using Chrome and Chromebooks.
I hope they will apply the same standard to other social media companies. And while they're at it, they should take a look at the data that Google collects from kids using Chrome and Chromebooks.
So a weak fine that is rolled into cost of doing business expense? AKA nothing.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It was hilarious how fast UK changed “online safety act” to . Just send your face and details to anonymous companies prone to data leaks just to hear songs with naughty words! See Spotify is too dangerous for children! Post anything about the issues with immigration in the UK? That is straight to jail territory now, and they know just where to find you. I’m not joking. I want to know what happened to the people that…
They all emigrated to the USA
It's clear every site on the internet without id checks (and even those who do check id since people can lie) are accessed by minors, I'm not sure what they expect.
this stuff is always pushed by people with either no technical understanding at all or just bad intentions
I hope they will apply the same standard to other social media companies. And while they're at it, they should take a look at the data that Google collects from kids using Chrome and Chromebooks.
"Google will only access, use, and otherwise process Customer Data in accordance with the Cloud Data Processing Addendum and will not access, use, or process Customer Data for any other purpose. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, Google will not process Customer Data for Advertising purposes or serve Advertising in the Services. Google has implemented and will maintain technical, organizational, and physical safeguards to protect Customer Data, as further described in the Cloud Data Processing Addendum."
I hope they will apply the same standard to other social media companies. And while they're at it, they should take a look at the data that Google collects from kids using Chrome and Chromebooks.
What kind of "sensitive data"? The page does not provide any details. Something as basic as an IP address could be considered "sensitive data" but collecting that is basically inevitable.
Check this out: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-news/news-and-announcements/20...
I hope they will apply the same standard to other social media companies. And while they're at it, they should take a look at the data that Google collects from kids using Chrome and Chromebooks.
> I hope they will apply the same standard to other social media companies. So a weak fine that is rolled into cost of doing business expense? AKA nothing.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I hope they will apply the same standard to other social media companies. So a weak fine that is rolled into cost of doing business expense? AKA nothing.
They can't fine at the OPC, they can't even force action. Though sometimes that is a good thing as it opened up some room for class actions, in Ontario at least.