[deleted]
Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
11–20 of 21 posts
Re: Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
#12We see that the current administration has their censorship fingers in everything, which really takes the air out of whatever impact they think this has.
The Disinformation Governance Board (DGB) was a short-lived DHS advisory group, running from March 2, 2022, to August 24, 2022. It was pitched as a way to combat "misinformation," but let's call it what it was: a top-down attempt to gatekeep truth. The red team hasn't spun up their own version of this Orwellian nightmare -- probably because they lean on something bigger than bureaucracy, like a belief in free thought…
If you're alive in '25 and worried about '22, I have bad news for you.
> If you're peddling censorship disguised as safety, the only thing you deserve is a one-way ticket to obscurity, or a jail cell.
Jailing people you don't agree with is certainly a take that puts you in excellent company.
Re: Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
#13We see that the current administration has their censorship fingers in everything, which really takes the air out of whatever impact they think this has.
The Disinformation Governance Board (DGB) was a short-lived DHS advisory group, running from March 2, 2022, to August 24, 2022. It was pitched as a way to combat "misinformation," but let's call it what it was: a top-down attempt to gatekeep truth. The red team hasn't spun up their own version of this Orwellian nightmare -- probably because they lean on something bigger than bureaucracy, like a belief in free thought…
> It was pitched as a way to combat "misinformation," but let's call it what it was: a top-down attempt to gatekeep truth.
Disseminating accurate information and handling misinformation is literally one of the mandates of the DHS. Nobody batted an eye when the government did the exact same thing for the Spanish Flu, or the Boll Weevil blight, or smallpox. It was never perfect, but it was not inherently political in nature until one side laid down on the tracks and voluntarily became a victim.
We can debate all day as to whether the previous administration went too far in regards to Covid, but clearly all of the conspiracy theorists have kept their jobs and stayed on the air so it can't have been that effective. And it's also clearly a different beast to what is happening now, where it's not even done under the auspices of pragmatism but as a way to punish political adversaries only for existing.
Re: Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
#14[deleted]
[deleted]
Re: Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
#15If you read the actual letter they link, this summary is misleading https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-j... The administration pressured them in regards to Covid-19 and election interference content, but the Counsel makes it extremely clear that Youtube did not comply.
"The administration pressured them in regards to Covid-19 and election interference content"
Then why did thousands of accounts get banned for political speech? I've been seeing people screaming about the FCC 'pressuring' ABC to fire Jimmy Kimmel.
Yet, this, which was actually known a few years ago, is all but silenced in the mainstream news and on Facebook.
I would ask why, but we all know why.
Re: Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
#16If you read the actual letter they link, this summary is misleading https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-j... The administration pressured them in regards to Covid-19 and election interference content, but the Counsel makes it extremely clear that Youtube did not comply.
"The administration pressured them in regards to Covid-19 and election interference content" Then why did thousands of accounts get banned for political speech? I've been seeing people screaming about the FCC 'pressuring' ABC to fire Jimmy Kimmel. Yet, this, which was actually known a few years ago, is all but silenced in the mainstream news and on Facebook. I would ask why, but we all know why.
They were banned for violating Community Guidelines, not for political speech: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9288567?hl=en
Re: Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
#17If you read the actual letter they link, this summary is misleading https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-j... The administration pressured them in regards to Covid-19 and election interference content, but the Counsel makes it extremely clear that Youtube did not comply.
"The administration pressured them in regards to Covid-19 and election interference content" Then why did thousands of accounts get banned for political speech? I've been seeing people screaming about the FCC 'pressuring' ABC to fire Jimmy Kimmel. Yet, this, which was actually known a few years ago, is all but silenced in the mainstream news and on Facebook. I would ask why, but we all know why.
[deleted]
Re: Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Disinformation Governance Board (DGB) was a short-lived DHS advisory group, running from March 2, 2022, to August 24, 2022. It was pitched as a way to combat "misinformation," but let's call it what it was: a top-down attempt to gatekeep truth. The red team hasn't spun up their own version of this Orwellian nightmare -- probably because they lean on something bigger than bureaucracy, like a belief in free thought…
If you're alive in '25 and worried about '22, I have bad news for you. > If you're peddling censorship disguised as safety, the only thing you deserve is a one-way ticket to obscurity, or a jail cell. Jailing people you don't agree with is certainly a take that puts you in excellent company.
The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which effectively gutted the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act’s restrictions on domestic propaganda, was passed under a blue team controlled executive and senate. This wasn't a bipartisan effort—it was a deliberate move by the blue team to dismantle a post-WWII safeguard designed to prevent the U.S. government from targeting its own citizens with state-crafted narratives.
The original act ensured the U.S. Information Agency’s output, like Voice of America, stayed outward-focused. The 2012 repeal, slipped into a defense spending bill and opened the door for domestic dissemination of government-produced content (read: propaganda).
Why would a single party push this through? Draw your own conclusions, but the implications for information control are hard to ignore. Look at the timing: right as social media was becoming a primary news source.
Re: Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're alive in '25 and worried about '22, I have bad news for you. > If you're peddling censorship disguised as safety, the only thing you deserve is a one-way ticket to obscurity, or a jail cell. Jailing people you don't agree with is certainly a take that puts you in excellent company.
The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, which effectively gutted the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act’s restrictions on domestic propaganda, was passed under a blue team controlled executive and senate. This wasn't a bipartisan effort—it was a deliberate move by the blue team to dismantle a post-WWII safeguard designed to prevent the U.S. government from targeting its own citizens with state-crafted narratives. The original a…
Oh no, not the infamous baby-eating blue team!
Care to comment on what happened to Voice of America recently when baby-loving red team had their way?
Re: Google Admits Censorship Under Biden
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
"The administration pressured them in regards to Covid-19 and election interference content" Then why did thousands of accounts get banned for political speech? I've been seeing people screaming about the FCC 'pressuring' ABC to fire Jimmy Kimmel. Yet, this, which was actually known a few years ago, is all but silenced in the mainstream news and on Facebook. I would ask why, but we all know why.
They were banned for violating Community Guidelines, not for political speech: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9288567?hl=en
Which community guidelines did they violate?