Live data from Hacker News

Scream cipher

sethmlarson.dev

11–20 of 112 posts

Re: Scream cipher

#12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substitution_cipher

First sentence: > with the help of a key So, where is the key?

The key is the data table, representing which each character encodes to or from.

Re: Scream cipher

#13
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substitution_cipher

First sentence: > with the help of a key So, where is the key?

In the code in this article, the key is the mapping stored in ‘CIPHER’.

Re: Scream cipher

#14
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substitution_cipher

First sentence: > with the help of a key So, where is the key?

First, second, and third statements of the provided source code.

Re: Scream cipher

#15
post #9
post #5

Now pack even more info in each character with Zalgo text.

am I unusual in not really seeing the "creepiness" of zalgo text?

Think of it as representing something like the letters actively 'creeping' and giving off tendrils of darkness. Does this help?

Re: Scream cipher

#17
post #6
post #3

... in the same sense that ROT13 or base64 would be a cipher.

Yes https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substitution_cipher

… and no, since neither the enciphering nor the deciphering do a 1:1 mapping for all possible input code points.

Re: Scream cipher

#19
post #17
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substitution_cipher

… and no, since neither the enciphering nor the deciphering do a 1:1 mapping for all possible input code points.

That's not a requirement. Pigpen is a substitution cipher.

Re: Scream cipher

#20
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First, second, and third statements of the provided source code.

Like i said, by these measurements, base64 would also be a cipher.

And people are telling you yes, they (rot13 and base64) are indeed ciphers. What's the confusion?
Post reply on HN