"...and intends to initiate a visa that would be issued to people identified by venture capital funds as candidates to create startup firms in Canada." Anyone else find this to be an odd way to go about it? VC firms have distinctly different goals when funding companies than the people actually running the company. I guess it raises some questions for me: (1) Is there a floor to how much funding is required? For lack…
(1) Given the abysmal failure of the previous 'entrepreneur' visa category, I believe that they would probably go with at least a 12mo runway, although the VC firms and startup team would probably have to justify (via paper projection - ha!) a reasonable 2yr runway.
(2) The example in the article provided was the case of Summify, which was acquired by Twitter[1]. That seems to be the spark (among others) to bring more attention to the issue of a lack of strong Canadian anchor companies[2]. Again, using the previous 'entrepreneur' visa category which supposedly was being used as a loophole, the government is trying to respond by focusing on previous examples and a growing chorus of media and startup community attention around keeping and growing Canadian startup talent.
(3) Assuming that an "entire" startup team might consist of 2-5 people (I wish I had a statistic to back this up somehow other than anecdotal reading), that's not a far stretch. If the founder(s) want to hire foreign workers, then that may be more difficult because Canada would sure want to encourage them to try attracting and keeping Canadian technical talent first.
[1]http://startupvisa.ca/summify-inspiration-by-startup-visa-ca...
[2]http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/ca...