Also, I have no desire to micromanage a bunch of robots. I rather build things.
I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
11–20 of 61 posts
Re: I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
#12Editing notes on the content - the content of this blog post is clearly AI-enhanced (emdash) which is ok but the tone is not. It's super flowery and oversold - example "It was a shift from a single laser to a powerful floodlight."
I'm not even going to bother reading the rest. Just give me the bullet points you fed the LLM at that point
Re: I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
#13So does any template off GitHub?
When you run the Laravel Installer, you got pretty much all of these for free (sans LLM) And within a normal work week, you can have a valid prototype with an admin panel (Laravel Nova), and a lot of stuff that the laravel ecosystem provides. The issue is not coding those stuff (they've already been coded for you). The issue is to know what exactly do you want that is not part of some templates, the actual business value of the software.
Re: I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
#14Re: I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
#15What did you use to write the blog post?
Re: I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
#16Hey HN, author here. I spent last week in a deep-dive experiment to see how far I could push modern agentic workflows on a greenfield project. I wanted to move past simple code generation and see if I could build a system where I was orchestrating a team of agents to build a full application. The results were pretty wild (~800 commits, 100+ PRs, and a functioning app we use internally at my company), but the most int…
Re: I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
#17Hey HN, author here. I spent last week in a deep-dive experiment to see how far I could push modern agentic workflows on a greenfield project. I wanted to move past simple code generation and see if I could build a system where I was orchestrating a team of agents to build a full application. The results were pretty wild (~800 commits, 100+ PRs, and a functioning app we use internally at my company), but the most int…
Ask yourself what happens when Claude releases Claude Code 2.0, which just uses AI to self-manage the swarms from a simpler prompt.
Re: I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
#18Re: I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
#19> The cognitive load of this new state was immense. After about three hours of intense orchestration, I would feel completely burnt.
I definitely feel that. It's like the job becomes solely architecting the system (not terrible) but you still need to hold the entire program in your head (deeply taxing) while it is updated by a 1,000 tiny cuts which can dislodge your mental model... and then you are screwed. It is important center yourself from time to time and ensure you are on solid ground. The best way to do that is to give things a minute to sink in. Unless I am boilerplating everything, I don't WANT to go faster.
In general, I don't have a lot of desire to go down this orchestrator path. Maybe once tooling and things settle down a bit it can be helpful at times, but usually I get more value from letting things breathe, especially if there are structural changes or new ideas that bubble up and need to be considered.
Before LLMs, I would never re-architect on the fly, but I am more willing to make structural changes mid-flight now because it is so costless. Things I used to architect "good enough" (with a plan to revise in 12 months now) can be done precisely right the first time after going halfway down a path then noodling on it for an a day or so.
This is "Not the Way to Architect," but it sure is an effective way to go from idea -> complete.
Re: I built a production app in a week by managing a swarm of 20 AI agents
#20Editing notes on the content - the content of this blog post is clearly AI-enhanced (emdash) which is ok but the tone is not. It's super flowery and oversold - example "It was a shift from a single laser to a powerful floodlight."
> this wasn't just X, it was Y I'm not even going to bother reading the rest. Just give me the bullet points you fed the LLM at that point
That said, maybe it's worth it to modify things so there is less "AI sounding" verbiage. Don't want folks to write it off as "AI Slop" because of certain phrases. TBD!