Gow - The lightweight alternative to Cygwin
11–19 of 19 posts
Re: Gow - The lightweight alternative to Cygwin
#12No, for many years the lightweight alternative has been mingw. http://www.mingw.org/
Re: Gow - The lightweight alternative to Cygwin
#13I'm glad that this post actually pointed me to the brand new release which hopefully will provide a fix for a file permission bug that I recently hit.
UnxUtils is another similar package that I have successfully used in the past. I think I jumped to Gow because I saw it here by the time I was getting back to Windows.
Re: Gow - The lightweight alternative to Cygwin
#14My only problem with Cygwin is that installing and updating packages is a pain since you need to use the setup program. Apart from that it works great for what I use it for - a unixy shell with ports of a few tools I like using.
Re: Gow - The lightweight alternative to Cygwin
#15No ssh command?
Re: Gow - The lightweight alternative to Cygwin
#16For me, it's worth the 'price' of admission, just to get a usable instance of 'gfind', and avoiding the cognitive dissonance of typing 'ls' and not getting useful info.
And it's not the PITA that is cygwin.
Re: Gow - The lightweight alternative to Cygwin
#17No, for many years the lightweight alternative has been mingw. http://www.mingw.org/
Re: Gow - The lightweight alternative to Cygwin
#18This is a junk submission. Where to start? This project hasn't shown activity in 10 months. Furthermore, the project is largely written in VBScript and batch files, which is insanity, even according to Microsoft themselves. It was time to move to Powershell a long, long time ago. You even have solid projects like NuGet to jump off from for code and design. I can't take a project seriously when it's written in VBScrip…
> This is a junk submission. Where to start?
I've never submitted Gow to Hacker News but it does seem to pop up every once and a while and it gets the project a few hits.
This is a project I work on in my free time (and I get paid very well hourly so it's expensive to me) and if it weren't for programmers like me you wouldn't be able to do half the things you can do on your computer, so unless you've spent thousands of hours coding for free then please stop spreading the hate.
> This project hasn't shown activity in 10 months.
Please do your research. I just made a big release yesterday so the user that posted this wasn't just spamming HN.
https://github.com/bmatzelle/gow/wiki/change_log
> Furthermore, the project is largely written in VBScript and batch files, which is insanity
I wrote that script 10 years ago and it works with every version of Windows from Windows 2000 on. I made Gow so I could use Unix utilities on all versions of Windows. If I wrote it in PowerShell then it would force all users to either use a new version of Windows or download the PowerShell installer for zero added benefit. The script just adds Gow\bin to the PATH. Gow certainly doesn't need PowerShell for that.
Re: Gow - The lightweight alternative to Cygwin
#19This is a junk submission. Where to start? This project hasn't shown activity in 10 months. Furthermore, the project is largely written in VBScript and batch files, which is insanity, even according to Microsoft themselves. It was time to move to Powershell a long, long time ago. You even have solid projects like NuGet to jump off from for code and design. I can't take a project seriously when it's written in VBScrip…
Except Powershell uses a wholly different paradigm, won't run people's favorite shell scripts they've carried around with them for decades, and makes people's ingrained years of experience and learning largely moot. That doesn't sound like much of a "win" to me.
Gow, mingw, cygwin solves a very large need for very many people, for which Powershell is 100% inadequate.