Nvidia DGX Spark
11–20 of 222 posts
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark
#12Yeah, it’s miles better than WiFi. But if there was something I’d think maybe benefit from Thunderbolt this would’ve been it.
The ability to transfer large models or datasets that way just seems like it would be much faster and a real win for some customers.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark
#13Re: Nvidia DGX Spark
#14Re: Nvidia DGX Spark
#15?? this seems more than a little disingenuous...
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark
#16It's a bit disingenuous to claim 1 PFLOPs without making clear that's for FP4 (with "structured sparsity"?)
But yeah, this should have been further up.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark
#17Am I missing something or does the comparably priced (technically cheaper) Jetson Thor have double the PFLOPs of the Spark with the same memory capacity and similar bandwidth?
Architecturally, the DGX Spark has a far better cache setup to feed the GPU, and offers NVLINK support.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark
#18I’m not in this space, so I don’t know what’s normal, but I guess I’m a little surprised to see only 10 gig Ethernet for high speed connectivity. Yeah, it’s miles better than WiFi. But if there was something I’d think maybe benefit from Thunderbolt this would’ve been it. The ability to transfer large models or datasets that way just seems like it would be much faster and a real win for some customers.
Re: Nvidia DGX Spark
#19Am I missing something or does the comparably priced (technically cheaper) Jetson Thor have double the PFLOPs of the Spark with the same memory capacity and similar bandwidth?