Live data from Hacker News

2.5B Gmail users endangered after Google database hack

pcworld.com

11–17 of 17 posts

Re: 2.5B Gmail users endangered after Google database hack

#11
post #6

Isn't this huge from Google's security perspective? I don't recall any previous successful attack on its core infrastructure. A quick search/prompt shows: - Operation Aurora: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Aurora > - 2010s global surveillance disclosures: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_global_surveillance_disc... >

The hack was on a Salesforce instance owned and operated by Salesforce but used by Google, not Google core infra.

Re: 2.5B Gmail users endangered after Google database hack

#12
post #9

Duplicate of event from August 5 ("one of Google’s corporate Salesforce instances was impacted"): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44812343 https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/voi...

Salesforce did not have user data, so the title is bogus

Re: 2.5B Gmail users endangered after Google database hack

#14
This article links to a Forbes article that states it was a leak of a Saleforce instance that contained contact information about small and medium businesses.

This PCWorld article seems to be taking that to mean that every single gmail account (2.5B) is at risk with nothing to support that claim.

Re: 2.5B Gmail users endangered after Google database hack

#15
post #6

Isn't this huge from Google's security perspective? I don't recall any previous successful attack on its core infrastructure. A quick search/prompt shows: - Operation Aurora: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Aurora > - 2010s global surveillance disclosures: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_global_surveillance_disc... >

The headline looks incorrect. This looks like a blogspam of a blogspam of the original Salesforce database hack reported a while ago, where Google Cloud customers had their company name and contact information stolen. This information is useful for phishing attacks on those Google Cloud customers. Free Gmail users wouldn't be in that database.

Re: 2.5B Gmail users endangered after Google database hack

#16
post #10
post #7

> Activate Google’s Advanced Protection Program I'm dubious. This requires you give google a phone number. Almost universally if you give a company a phone number there is eventually an avenue for an attacker to convince the company to give them control of the account by demonstrating control of the number (which they've sim swapped or otherwise hijacked). Even if at the moment there is no avenue to exploit google th…

A phone number is optional if you give a recovery email. Create an iCloud account you don't use for any other reason and don't share it with anyone.

Nope. Doesn't work. Insists on adding a recovery phone number.

Re: 2.5B Gmail users endangered after Google database hack

#17
post #16
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A phone number is optional if you give a recovery email. Create an iCloud account you don't use for any other reason and don't share it with anyone.

Nope. Doesn't work. Insists on adding a recovery phone number.

What if you enroll two security keys?
Post reply on HN