How do people deploy this framework typically - speaking for myself, I found NGINX Unit somewhat fiddly.
With uvicorn.
Litestar is worth a look
11–20 of 86 posts
Re: Litestar is worth a look
#12Pretty cool post! I'm not sure how I feel about SQLAlchemy (not the star of the post but mentioned quite a bit); it's such a big ball of state that has so many surprises, I wonder if some people build entirely without it.
I recently built a personal project using peewee and it doesn't have a ton of bells and whistles but it works well for what it does do.
Re: Litestar is worth a look
#13It's a python web framework, for those curious to know more before clicking through.
thanks, saved me some time.
Re: Litestar is worth a look
#14How do people deploy this framework typically - speaking for myself, I found NGINX Unit somewhat fiddly.
uvicorn systemd service behind nginx reverse proxy
Re: Litestar is worth a look
#15Pretty cool post! I'm not sure how I feel about SQLAlchemy (not the star of the post but mentioned quite a bit); it's such a big ball of state that has so many surprises, I wonder if some people build entirely without it.
I usually just use asyncpg.
Re: Litestar is worth a look
#16Pretty cool post! I'm not sure how I feel about SQLAlchemy (not the star of the post but mentioned quite a bit); it's such a big ball of state that has so many surprises, I wonder if some people build entirely without it.
I usually just use asyncpg.
You can use asyncpg in SQLAlchemy
Re: Litestar is worth a look
#17Re: Litestar is worth a look
#18I've been using Litestar for over a year now, serving both JSON and templated HTML. Great all-around Python async framework that manages to be fast (faster than FastAPI), lightweight, and still has enough batteries included to host a website with auth, sessions, etc. I'm a fan of first-class msgspec support and the Controller class for nested routing.
Highly recommend.
Re: Litestar is worth a look
#19love litestar.. working on migrating a couple of internal consoles to it from fastAPI.
the docs could use some love though.
i feel most of it is references [1], the "how to"s could be better.
inb4, "where pull request", i don't grok asgi or the framework nuances to be able to say how to improve on it.
Re: Litestar is worth a look
#20I've been using Litestar for over a year now, serving both JSON and templated HTML. Great all-around Python async framework that manages to be fast (faster than FastAPI), lightweight, and still has enough batteries included to host a website with auth, sessions, etc. I'm a fan of first-class msgspec support and the Controller class for nested routing. Highly recommend.
It definitely seems worth checking out. I've been using FastAPI for a few years now.