Live data from Hacker News

Travis CI integrated into GitHub pull requests thanks to new Commit Status API

github.com

11–20 of 23 posts

Re: Travis CI integrated into GitHub pull requests thanks to new Commit Status API

#11
post #10
post #2

I love this a lot , but I would love this more if GitHub bought up Travis so I can do things like have Travis run on private repositories. I'm really glad Travis has such awesome sponsors keeping them alive, but I think most paying customers of GitHub would be more than happy to pay an extra $5 a month or something to have priority queuing on Travis, and ability to run on private repos and such. With build checking b…

> I really don't know what else GitHub would be missing from the overall process of checking in code. CI as-a-service is a massive undertaking, and requires different focus from what GitHub is currently doing. Three main differences are 1) lots and lots of devops. You have to support dozens of ruby, python, php versions. You have to support the version that Heroku uses, the one that EY uses, the one that AppFog uses.…

Hello, I cannot easily find your pricing page. This is a non-starter when trying to convince our org to use CircleCI. Am I blind? Need this info before I can move forward.

Re: Travis CI integrated into GitHub pull requests thanks to new Commit Status API

#12
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I really don't know what else GitHub would be missing from the overall process of checking in code. CI as-a-service is a massive undertaking, and requires different focus from what GitHub is currently doing. Three main differences are 1) lots and lots of devops. You have to support dozens of ruby, python, php versions. You have to support the version that Heroku uses, the one that EY uses, the one that AppFog uses.…

Hello, I cannot easily find your pricing page. This is a non-starter when trying to convince our org to use CircleCI. Am I blind? Need this info before I can move forward.

Login and go to the settings > plan page:

https://circleci.com/account/plans

Re: Travis CI integrated into GitHub pull requests thanks to new Commit Status API

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hello, I cannot easily find your pricing page. This is a non-starter when trying to convince our org to use CircleCI. Am I blind? Need this info before I can move forward.

Login and go to the settings > plan page: https://circleci.com/account/plans

Nope, this page needs to be outside the login wall. I'm not creating an account just to see pricing levels.

Re: Travis CI integrated into GitHub pull requests thanks to new Commit Status API

#14
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I really don't know what else GitHub would be missing from the overall process of checking in code. CI as-a-service is a massive undertaking, and requires different focus from what GitHub is currently doing. Three main differences are 1) lots and lots of devops. You have to support dozens of ruby, python, php versions. You have to support the version that Heroku uses, the one that EY uses, the one that AppFog uses.…

Hello, I cannot easily find your pricing page. This is a non-starter when trying to convince our org to use CircleCI. Am I blind? Need this info before I can move forward.

You're right, sorry. This is a technical limitation for now (the inner and outer are separate apps). We're merging them real soon now. We start at $20/month for one project and scale up from there. We offer bigger plans for more projects, more concurrent builds, and auto-parallelization.

Re: Travis CI integrated into GitHub pull requests thanks to new Commit Status API

#15

Great to see Travis supporting Pull Requests. At Mozilla we've been using Bot.io for several of our Github projects (PDF.js, Firefox OS, Popcorn.js, etc) since mid-2011 to launch regression tests right from Pull Requests. It's fully customizeable (runs on Windows, Linux, Mac, etc), open source, and a breeze to install: http://github.com/arturadib/botio We'll likely be implementing the status API very soon. Let me kno…

I think BuildHive (https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/) supports Pull Requests too. I'm using for my repositories, and I have an internal Jenkins server for private repositories.

Re: Travis CI integrated into GitHub pull requests thanks to new Commit Status API

#16
post #15

Great to see Travis supporting Pull Requests. At Mozilla we've been using Bot.io for several of our Github projects (PDF.js, Firefox OS, Popcorn.js, etc) since mid-2011 to launch regression tests right from Pull Requests. It's fully customizeable (runs on Windows, Linux, Mac, etc), open source, and a breeze to install: http://github.com/arturadib/botio We'll likely be implementing the status API very soon. Let me kno…

I think BuildHive ( https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/ ) supports Pull Requests too. I'm using for my repositories, and I have an internal Jenkins server for private repositories.

Yes, they do: https://github.com/jenkinsci/github-plugin/pull/17

Kohsuke Kawaguchi (the creator of Jenkins) has added this API to his Java library for Github: https://github.com/kohsuke/github-api/commit/892d2acaa2ca737... So, it's just a matter of time until that trickles downstream to the plugin and BuildHive.

Re: Travis CI integrated into GitHub pull requests thanks to new Commit Status API

#18
post #2

I love this a lot , but I would love this more if GitHub bought up Travis so I can do things like have Travis run on private repositories. I'm really glad Travis has such awesome sponsors keeping them alive, but I think most paying customers of GitHub would be more than happy to pay an extra $5 a month or something to have priority queuing on Travis, and ability to run on private repos and such. With build checking b…

This is only for rails projects, but we use semaphore for about a month or so on our private repository, and it's really sweet. Very simple and clean interface. Nicely customizable, and the support guys are really great too (they customized the version of redis just for our project and basically really help out on any question). I don't work for them, or get anything out of recommending their service, but we're really happy with the service so far. Price is a little higher than $5 a month, but still quite reasonable.

Re: Travis CI integrated into GitHub pull requests thanks to new Commit Status API

#20
post #2

I love this a lot , but I would love this more if GitHub bought up Travis so I can do things like have Travis run on private repositories. I'm really glad Travis has such awesome sponsors keeping them alive, but I think most paying customers of GitHub would be more than happy to pay an extra $5 a month or something to have priority queuing on Travis, and ability to run on private repos and such. With build checking b…

This is only for rails projects, but we use semaphore for about a month or so on our private repository, and it's really sweet. Very simple and clean interface. Nicely customizable, and the support guys are really great too (they customized the version of redis just for our project and basically really help out on any question). I don't work for them, or get anything out of recommending their service, but we're reall…

any particular reason to downvote this? (noticed that the other mention of semaphore got downvoted too). It would be nice to know why. I'm relatively new to HN, but haven't had much stuff downvoted, and not sure what might be wrong with my comment.
Post reply on HN