11–18 of 18 posts
"include/proto/proto_http.h" defined "error_message", this is in conflict with the "error_message" already defined in "et/com_err.h", which is included by "krb5/krb5.h", which itself is included by "openssl/kssl.h", which included by "openssl/ssl.h"
Where do I submit a bug report? Couldn't find the link on haproxy site.
Right now I do nginx (for SSL) -> Varnish (caching) -> nginx (static media/proxying) -> gunicorn (Django). I'd love to remove many of those parts.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is haproxy reloading an issue ? It works pretty well in my experience (although I am not in the web business anymore, so things may have changed in the last two years).
Reloading is no issue when you have few frontends or backends. But when you have a lot of front- or backends, the configuration file will be huge, and reloading will take some time. If you need to reload every few seconds, this might even cause downtime. But I guess our workload is not the usual implementation of HAProxy...
Uh, yeah, I suspect your workload is unusual.
Can anyone tell me how HAProxy compares to Varnish? I've used the latter and swear by it, but I've never used HAProxy. Is it as amazingly fast at caching as Varnish is? Right now I do nginx (for SSL) -> Varnish (caching) -> nginx (static media/proxying) -> gunicorn (Django). I'd love to remove many of those parts.
Can anyone tell me how HAProxy compares to Varnish? I've used the latter and swear by it, but I've never used HAProxy. Is it as amazingly fast at caching as Varnish is? Right now I do nginx (for SSL) -> Varnish (caching) -> nginx (static media/proxying) -> gunicorn (Django). I'd love to remove many of those parts.
[1] http://blog.exceliance.fr/2012/07/04/haproxy-and-varnish-com...
[2] http://blog.exceliance.fr/2012/08/25/haproxy-varnish-and-the...
Can anyone tell me how HAProxy compares to Varnish? I've used the latter and swear by it, but I've never used HAProxy. Is it as amazingly fast at caching as Varnish is? Right now I do nginx (for SSL) -> Varnish (caching) -> nginx (static media/proxying) -> gunicorn (Django). I'd love to remove many of those parts.
Last I heard, HAProxy does not perform any caching. I agree that fewer components in the stack would be an improvement, but we seem to be in the minority.
I can not build it in Fedora (both 12 and 16). Ubuntu is fine. "include/proto/proto_http.h" defined "error_message", this is in conflict with the "error_message" already defined in "et/com_err.h", which is included by "krb5/krb5.h", which itself is included by "openssl/kssl.h", which included by "openssl/ssl.h" Where do I submit a bug report? Couldn't find the link on haproxy site.