USENIX and their conferences were the absolute best to publish with. You as a researcher focus on submitting papers and/or being part of the PC. They help organize the whole conference instead of depending on an army of volunteers (you won't see "general chairs" and "local chairs" unlike with ACM). And all papers were open access without even needing a login: you literally just click the PDF from the conference websi…
ACM Transitions to Full Open Access
11–20 of 63 posts
Re: ACM Transitions to Full Open Access
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
It has always worked like that.
This is just shifting the cost from the readers to the writers. It doesn't make it any better as the prices are completely out of touch with reality. Note that this is not the cost for registering at a conference; that is separate. This is just the publishing fee for each paper.
Re: ACM Transitions to Full Open Access
#13Does anyone want to form an ACM Cool Papers Club?
Re: ACM Transitions to Full Open Access
#14I've greatly appreciated the ACM's movements toward open access, but I have to ask: What's the license? The Berlin Declaration that defined Open Access https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration defines it as follows: > 1. Open access contributions must satisfy two conditions:The author(s) and right holder(s) of such contributions grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, right of access to, and a licen…
Re: ACM Transitions to Full Open Access
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
It has always worked like that.
This is just shifting the cost from the readers to the writers. It doesn't make it any better as the prices are completely out of touch with reality. Note that this is not the cost for registering at a conference; that is separate. This is just the publishing fee for each paper.
Re: ACM Transitions to Full Open Access
#16Holy smoke!! I have so many old documents to read now. Does anyone want to form an ACM Cool Papers Club?
Re: ACM Transitions to Full Open Access
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is just shifting the cost from the readers to the writers. It doesn't make it any better as the prices are completely out of touch with reality. Note that this is not the cost for registering at a conference; that is separate. This is just the publishing fee for each paper.
It's not really shifting the cost from readers to writers, since these fee existed beforehand though. They just went from double-dipping to single dipping.
Re: ACM Transitions to Full Open Access
#18With publishing prices ranging from $700 to $1800. Some real art of the deal stuff here.
It has always worked like that.
Re: ACM Transitions to Full Open Access
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not really shifting the cost from readers to writers, since these fee existed beforehand though. They just went from double-dipping to single dipping.
The open access pricing is different and higher than the old closed access pricing. That is the switch in all open access publishing. In any case, both the old prices and new ones are absurdly high.