Live data from Hacker News

App Icon Wars

appiconwars.com

11–17 of 17 posts

Re: App Icon Wars

#11
post #9

These are horrible icons. scaled down to the actual size they would be displayed at, they lose all clarity and shape. An icon needs to have a very simple and clear basic shape. Tiny details can be added on top of that, like texture on a paper, but must only be a compliment to the main shape.

If the purpose of the icon was to actually use them for apps, I would agree. However, I don't think the designer intended them as anything other than a tribute to Star Wars in app-icon format. On that account, they're a pretty awesome tribute and pulled off really well within such a constraint.

Re: App Icon Wars

#12
post #9

These are horrible icons. scaled down to the actual size they would be displayed at, they lose all clarity and shape. An icon needs to have a very simple and clear basic shape. Tiny details can be added on top of that, like texture on a paper, but must only be a compliment to the main shape.

It's not about being an icon anymore, it's just about having a standardized context to design in, like writing Haikus. At least that's the best I can say about this art form after looking at Dribbble's "popular" timeline a lot.

The other popular Photoshop pastime seems to be designing weather widget mockups.

Re: App Icon Wars

#14

Try scrolling to see a really nice CSS3 transition.

I don't see it on chrome 21. Either it's too subtle, or it's not working, or I'm too dumb.

On Chrome 21 + Linux I see the images tilt backwards and fade off into the background as I scroll down. Obviously intended to emulate the scrolling prologue at the start of each Star Wars movie.

Re: App Icon Wars

#17
post #9

These are horrible icons. scaled down to the actual size they would be displayed at, they lose all clarity and shape. An icon needs to have a very simple and clear basic shape. Tiny details can be added on top of that, like texture on a paper, but must only be a compliment to the main shape.

If the purpose of the icon was to actually use them for apps, I would agree. However, I don't think the designer intended them as anything other than a tribute to Star Wars in app-icon format. On that account, they're a pretty awesome tribute and pulled off really well within such a constraint.

> pulled off really well within such a constraint.

That's the thing. They didn't follow the app icon constraint. The only constraint are that they are square with rounded corners.

I get that it's an art form in it's own, but calling them "icons" is just stupid.

Post reply on HN