These are horrible icons. scaled down to the actual size they would be displayed at, they lose all clarity and shape. An icon needs to have a very simple and clear basic shape. Tiny details can be added on top of that, like texture on a paper, but must only be a compliment to the main shape.
App Icon Wars
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: App Icon Wars
#12These are horrible icons. scaled down to the actual size they would be displayed at, they lose all clarity and shape. An icon needs to have a very simple and clear basic shape. Tiny details can be added on top of that, like texture on a paper, but must only be a compliment to the main shape.
The other popular Photoshop pastime seems to be designing weather widget mockups.
Re: App Icon Wars
#13Re: App Icon Wars
#14Try scrolling to see a really nice CSS3 transition.
I don't see it on chrome 21. Either it's too subtle, or it's not working, or I'm too dumb.
Re: App Icon Wars
#15Re: App Icon Wars
#16Re: App Icon Wars
#17These are horrible icons. scaled down to the actual size they would be displayed at, they lose all clarity and shape. An icon needs to have a very simple and clear basic shape. Tiny details can be added on top of that, like texture on a paper, but must only be a compliment to the main shape.
If the purpose of the icon was to actually use them for apps, I would agree. However, I don't think the designer intended them as anything other than a tribute to Star Wars in app-icon format. On that account, they're a pretty awesome tribute and pulled off really well within such a constraint.
That's the thing. They didn't follow the app icon constraint. The only constraint are that they are square with rounded corners.
I get that it's an art form in it's own, but calling them "icons" is just stupid.