The POSIX specification of vi
11–20 of 50 posts
Re: The POSIX specification of vi
#12Love vi, made a Vimgolf like app called: https://vimgolf.ai because I like vi so much. Although the app uses neovim underneath the hood because it had an easier API to work with.
Great site! I've been wanting to learn it for the past couple of weeks, but didn't have enough motivation to sit trhough tutorials. +1
[0]: https://pragprog.com/titles/dnvim2/practical-vim-second-edit...
Re: The POSIX specification of vi
#13Ugh, all this crazy head-spinning cursor commotion... I'll just keep using ed, thank you very much.
Re: The POSIX specification of vi
#14But it has a FOSS release, openEuler [1]
I actually want to download it now to check if the vi there is really that POSIX version
0, https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3622.htm
Re: The POSIX specification of vi
#15Re: The POSIX specification of vi
#16Love vi, made a Vimgolf like app called: https://vimgolf.ai because I like vi so much. Although the app uses neovim underneath the hood because it had an easier API to work with.
:w should count the same as ZZ for the purposes of hiding better solutions, else it's fairly easy to walk up the leaderboard even though the better solutions are ostensibly hidden.
Re: The POSIX specification of vi
#17You can see all the userland utilities by removing the "vi.HTML" suffix from the URL. https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/
mbox should die; or maybe set as a legacy option. Current systems can handle thousands of email by using maildirs.
Also, one day bsdgames will enter into POSIX maybe but as a test case, in order to be sure on how well the POSIX compatible API behaves.
Phantasia(6) could be rewritten for balance and such...
Re: The POSIX specification of vi
#18Love vi, made a Vimgolf like app called: https://vimgolf.ai because I like vi so much. Although the app uses neovim underneath the hood because it had an easier API to work with.
Marvellous! :w should count the same as ZZ for the purposes of hiding better solutions, else it's fairly easy to walk up the leaderboard even though the better solutions are ostensibly hidden.
Re: The POSIX specification of vi
#19Huawei EulerOS is one of the few POSIX compliant Linux distros, but it’s a commercial one [0] But it has a FOSS release, openEuler [1] I actually want to download it now to check if the vi there is really that POSIX version 0, https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3622.htm 1, https://www.openeuler.org/en/
1: https://dl-cdn.openeuler.openatom.cn/openEuler-25.03/source/...
Are they actually UNIX Conformant? That PDF just says they've entered a trademark license agreement. They're not listed in the conformance database.
Re: The POSIX specification of vi
#20Ugh, all this crazy head-spinning cursor commotion... I'll just keep using ed, thank you very much.