Live data from Hacker News

Subreply – An open source text-only social network

github.com

11–20 of 85 posts

Re: Subreply – An open source text-only social network

#11
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But there are no images here

I've been keeping a list of features to build into a HN browser extension for years now and this is one of the top items on my list. One of these days I'll get around to it.

I wasn't complaining. I love that HN is text only.

Re: Subreply – An open source text-only social network

#12
post #7

Gotta say that (1) images greatly improve engagement on things like Mastodon and Bluesky and (2) I have the most fun on those platforms sharing photos that I took.

Yeah, this reminds me of old Reddit where people resorted to imgur and other image hosts before they introduced their own photo upload feature.

I still love old Reddit

Re: Subreply – An open source text-only social network

#13
post #9

Trendiest post is from the developer saying "Mastodon is dead", four weeks ago, 12 replies. Sure bud.

You make it sound like they claim subreply is the thing that might have killed mastodon. The full post is:

Mastodon is dead. Most people have migrated to Bluesky or Threads.

Re: Subreply – An open source text-only social network

#14
post #12
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, this reminds me of old Reddit where people resorted to imgur and other image hosts before they introduced their own photo upload feature.

I still love old Reddit

https://old.reddit.com/

Re: Subreply – An open source text-only social network

#15
post #9

Trendiest post is from the developer saying "Mastodon is dead", four weeks ago, 12 replies. Sure bud.

You make it sound like they claim subreply is the thing that might have killed mastodon. The full post is: Mastodon is dead. Most people have migrated to Bluesky or Threads.

Thank you for the context. It’s important and often overlooked.

Re: Subreply – An open source text-only social network

#17
post #3

Gotta say that (1) images greatly improve engagement on things like Mastodon and Bluesky and (2) I have the most fun on those platforms sharing photos that I took.

But there are no images here

... and what I post to Mastodon/Bluesky is different from what I post to HN

https://mastodon.social/@UP8

For instance, I post links to phys.org a lot more and I'm less likely to post a link to the paper because (1) Mastodon can't extract images out of the latter and (2) I get more replies like "this is over my head" from Mastodonsters whereas I think most of you might think you'd look stupid if you said something like that. On the other hand I rarely post links to The Guardian to Mastodon because it can't extract images from Guardian articles.

Bonus: if you look right now you'll see the user interface that I use to post to HN! [1]

[1] permalink that documents the mysterious YOShInOn: https://mastodon.social/@UP8/114887102728039235

Re: Subreply – An open source text-only social network

#18

Gotta say that (1) images greatly improve engagement on things like Mastodon and Bluesky and (2) I have the most fun on those platforms sharing photos that I took.

I've never used Mastodon of Bluesky and I hate Twitter. I do feel pretty engaged with HN, and it is text-only. I'm not sure what makes "social media" different from a discussion board though, so I don't know whether HN counts. I do remember that github used to call itself social coding, which was one factor making me want to stay away from it.

Re: Subreply – An open source text-only social network

#19
Two clicks into this and I say someone posting "Killing n** (free speech)" from a poster named "N*** killer".

I am, in fact, pro free speech. But this is a bad look. I'm not even saying this is a problem with subreply. It is some other kind of problem. A problem with a subset of people who like free speech or something? I don't get it.

Re: Subreply – An open source text-only social network

#20

Two clicks into this and I say someone posting "Killing n** (free speech)" from a poster named "N*** killer". I am, in fact, pro free speech. But this is a bad look. I'm not even saying this is a problem with subreply. It is some other kind of problem. A problem with a subset of people who like free speech or something? I don't get it.

It's worth pointing out that the post in question was made in the past half hour amidst the wave of activity from HN. Not to say your point isn't valid, but I think this is more an example of trolls who will say anything and everything to cause anger and insult; it's not representative of those who believe in free speech, or the site itself for that matter.
Post reply on HN