I observe or believe that an MVP (product and strategy) exists in the context of the current time and marketplace, with a view to figuring out how the customer responds to it, so has evolved over time as the customer expectations have matured.
Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
11–20 of 28 posts
Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
#12The keyword here is customers
If you are building something for others, which you expect to make money from, then you should probably be thinking about a Minimum Sellable Product - what is the most basic product that a very specific target user or group of target users, will pay for. Or at the very least the target users must be willing (and ideally eager) to use the product “for real” (eg. for work or daily personal use)
This means your MVP or MSP, could very well be just a spreadsheet, or a basic document, as long as it’s clearly targeting specific people who want/need to use it
Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
#13I have seen the worst imaginable software UX used and cherished by people when it was doing the job.
I have seen great UI/UX go away as people did not handle it.
Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
#14Huh? I have seen the worst imaginable software UX used and cherished by people when it was doing the job. I have seen great UI/UX go away as people did not handle it.
Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
#15Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
#16Minimum viable product used to mean, "What do we build that hooks a customer immediately?". It is about getting them engaged and learning from their engagement to then build features onto the MVP.
Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
#17looks at Adobe Illustrator
picks up the manual for Creature House Expression, a 2003 natural media vector editor just oozing with better and more thoughtful implementations of things Illustrator still barely does, bought by Microsoft and killed
sighs
Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
#18The first iphone for example, was very barebones: slow EDGE internet, only a few apps, very low powered device. But people loved it because the things it did well it did very well- for instance it was a beautiful touchscreen that always remained silky smooth. The feeling of sliding something and having it stay under your finger really tricks your brain in a way nothing did before, and is so good you forget the weaknesses and missing features.
Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
#19The problem I see is that investing is happening before even basic demonstrations. Billions of dollars are being given to people who haven't even put together a slide deck. Worse! We're throwing money at people who haven't done the basics AND experts are highly confident will fail. All while ignoring those with viable prototypes who need money to scale... But what really gets me is that it's become commonplace to jus…
Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product
#20The problem I see is that investing is happening before even basic demonstrations. Billions of dollars are being given to people who haven't even put together a slide deck. Worse! We're throwing money at people who haven't done the basics AND experts are highly confident will fail. All while ignoring those with viable prototypes who need money to scale... But what really gets me is that it's become commonplace to jus…
A fool and his money are soon parted.