Live data from Hacker News

Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

raspasov.posthaven.com

11–20 of 28 posts

Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

#11
My perspective is more as a small business founder creating an app to solve real world problems in a small market, rather than a VC/Silicon Valley. (So I don’t know for sure how my views stack with “conventional” business wisdom. Maybe smarter people disagree.)

I observe or believe that an MVP (product and strategy) exists in the context of the current time and marketplace, with a view to figuring out how the customer responds to it, so has evolved over time as the customer expectations have matured.

Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

#12
> An early, basic version of a product (such as a piece of technology, a computer program, etc.) which meets the minimum necessary requirements for use by its creators and customers

The keyword here is customers

If you are building something for others, which you expect to make money from, then you should probably be thinking about a Minimum Sellable Product - what is the most basic product that a very specific target user or group of target users, will pay for. Or at the very least the target users must be willing (and ideally eager) to use the product “for real” (eg. for work or daily personal use)

This means your MVP or MSP, could very well be just a spreadsheet, or a basic document, as long as it’s clearly targeting specific people who want/need to use it

Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

#14
post #13

Huh? I have seen the worst imaginable software UX used and cherished by people when it was doing the job. I have seen great UI/UX go away as people did not handle it.

100%. I have also seen software used and hated (sap? salesforce? even jira?) because they were first in their niche or because who knows why.

Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

#15
The best mental model of MVP I have found is that it is in some sense a science experiment and you’re trying to test a specific hypothesis as efficiently as possible with the resources you have, because you ultimately don’t know what’s going to work.

Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

#16
A minimum viable product that is very large and takes years to get out is just scope creep disguised as minimum viable product.

Minimum viable product used to mean, "What do we build that hooks a customer immediately?". It is about getting them engaged and learning from their engagement to then build features onto the MVP.

Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

#17
> Now think about a bad software product that you might encounter briefly or you are forced to use: a poorly designed electronic kiosk with 1000ms lag on every interaction, or a hospital electronic system. I think there's a high chance that the people building them rarely use them, or not at all.

looks at Adobe Illustrator

picks up the manual for Creature House Expression, a 2003 natural media vector editor just oozing with better and more thoughtful implementations of things Illustrator still barely does, bought by Microsoft and killed

sighs

Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

#18
There’s also the concept of Minimum Lovable Product.

The first iphone for example, was very barebones: slow EDGE internet, only a few apps, very low powered device. But people loved it because the things it did well it did very well- for instance it was a beautiful touchscreen that always remained silky smooth. The feeling of sliding something and having it stay under your finger really tricks your brain in a way nothing did before, and is so good you forget the weaknesses and missing features.

Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

#19
post #9

The problem I see is that investing is happening before even basic demonstrations. Billions of dollars are being given to people who haven't even put together a slide deck. Worse! We're throwing money at people who haven't done the basics AND experts are highly confident will fail. All while ignoring those with viable prototypes who need money to scale... But what really gets me is that it's become commonplace to jus…

A fool and his money are soon parted.

Re: Evolution of Minimum Viable Product

#20
post #9

The problem I see is that investing is happening before even basic demonstrations. Billions of dollars are being given to people who haven't even put together a slide deck. Worse! We're throwing money at people who haven't done the basics AND experts are highly confident will fail. All while ignoring those with viable prototypes who need money to scale... But what really gets me is that it's become commonplace to jus…

A fool and his money are soon parted.

It is a nice aphorism by an economy shouldn't be based on duping people. It's literally why we have regulations. Why you can't make Ponzi schemes. You literally are not allowed to lie to investors though we love to ignore the spirit in favor of the letter of the law.
Post reply on HN