Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
11–20 of 665 posts
Re: Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
#12[flagged]
Isnt that how the system is supposed to work, unless you think Apple would be always benevolent? I think HNers make a mistake (and believe Apple's marketing) that Apple always stands for users, cares about design, pushing the boundary, "think different" etc. It is painfully obvious, but Apple's singular goal is to make money (profit for shareholders) and THAT IS A GOOD THING. They'll cut corners, test the boundaries…
Re: Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
#13[flagged]
Re: Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
#14[flagged]
Re: Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
#15I'm not smart enough to get into the politics of other parts of the world, but just because the EU found something illegal doesn't mean its the basis of a good lawsuit under the US rules. Will be interesting to see how this unfolds.
Re: Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
#16[flagged]
Re: Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
#17Re: Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
#18Re: Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
#19There is a lot I hate about building apps and releasing them on the App Store, and I'd be happy for there to be alternatives. But that said, I don't understand how its a monopoly. There is no requirement to build an app for iOS devices. There are other devices and means for software delivery out there. What makes their control of their own ecosystem monopolistic? As someone who has paid the apple tax for digital sale…
Re: Proton joins suit against Apple for practices that harm developers and consumers
#20If a company invests billions in R&D to create hardware and its integrated software, shouldn’t it have the right to control who or what interacts with it? Why should I be forced to open up the carefully designed ecosystem I’ve built?
If my pitch is premium, high-speed hardware and intuitive software so user-friendly that a monkey can use it, the trade-off is that you agree to my Terms of Service. There are other options out there.