My home servers are not a homelab
11–20 of 104 posts
Re: My home servers are not a homelab
#121. No fault tolerance or high availability
2. It can evaporate just as quickly as it formed
3. Same contents as the cloud (plus some local contaminants)
On a serious note: I wish more of the homelab community was focused on self-hosting (puddles should be awesome!), but it seems to mostly be folks justifying the purchase of large amounts of used equipment for “education” (internet points).
Re: My home servers are not a homelab
#13For instance, I'd argue homelabbing with Kubernetes makes sense, selfhosting with Kubernetes is stupid. Because the only reason you should ever run that at home is practice for work.
Re: My home servers are not a homelab
#14Re: My home servers are not a homelab
#15How about 'On Premise Micro Data Centre" :-p Doesn't quite role off the tongue though, not even a good acronym. Maybe Personal Data Centre (pdc)? There's some cross over with r/selfhosted but that generally includes people hosting things on VPS/Bare metal.
Which premise is this based on?
Re: My home servers are not a homelab
#16Re: My home servers are not a homelab
#17I took from the article that the term homelab makes it sound like the use case is trite, hobbyist or not serious.
Re: My home servers are not a homelab
#18I have one at home, too, running pricetracker.wtf, among other things.
It has a 56G network switch i will never be able to saturate, more compute than i'll probably need.
Looking to add 24 disk JBOD - i will never probably saturate or fill either.
Re: My home servers are not a homelab
#19Re: My home servers are not a homelab
#20Edit: Looking at your "de-googling" post, which resembles a lot of privacy theatre, this just seems like nothing more than an attention grab