Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

blog.miloslavhomer.cz

11–20 of 238 posts

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#11

For most businesses, the cost and difficulty of shifting away from Microsoft outweigh the benefits

Maybe.

Some things go deep, true. However most businesses don't use most of Microsoft products - even the ones that do, the usage of the more complicated products is far more minuscule than imagined by e.g. CFOs, etc.

The real thing keeping many "in the fold" as it were would be authentication services.

Which are overcomplicated and probably easier to manage without...

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#12

Fundamentally it’s hard to pushback against an authoritarian government. There is very little to stop Trump from sending Doge into MS headquarters with Marines and demanding admin access so they can make the change. Thinking the dependency on Microsoft (or any company) is the risk then you haven’t been paying attention.

That’s the point of federation. If there’s no centralized target then the Marines have a much harder job.

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#13
post #11

For most businesses, the cost and difficulty of shifting away from Microsoft outweigh the benefits

Maybe. Some things go deep, true. However most businesses don't use most of Microsoft products - even the ones that do, the usage of the more complicated products is far more minuscule than imagined by e.g. CFOs, etc. The real thing keeping many "in the fold" as it were would be authentication services. Which are overcomplicated and probably easier to manage without...

Right, it’s stuff like Active Directory and how everything’s tied together. Once you’re using that for auth, it’s really tough to back out without a lot of effort.

We’ve looked into FreeIPA and similar options, but honestly, nothing really holds a candle to Active Directory yet.

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I wasn't aware of any major Trump-era policies that significantly reduced Microsoft’s dominance. Curious what you're referencing?

I also haven't read the article but apparently reading the comments the article has to do with Trump-era policies affecting Microsoft

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#15
> There was a recent incident where Microsoft somehow allegedly blocked a mailbox of a sanctioned individual. Any organization highly depending on MS products that might come into the crosshair should ask - can this happen to me? What would be the cost? How much I invest into prevention of this scenario? In this article I try to get the facts straight and use a return on security investment calculation to try and judge this situation in a rational way. Let’s grab our tinfoil hats and find out if it’ll be fine.

for people who didn't RTA

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wasn't aware of any major Trump-era policies that significantly reduced Microsoft’s dominance. Curious what you're referencing?

I also haven't read the article but apparently reading the comments the article has to do with Trump-era policies affecting Microsoft

Yeah, I skimmed the article too, but didn’t see much on Trump’s policies directly impacting Microsoft.

From what I gather, the bigger challenges for businesses are more about the tech ecosystem Microsoft has built. It's hard to just swap out core services like AD without huge disruptions.

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#17
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe. Some things go deep, true. However most businesses don't use most of Microsoft products - even the ones that do, the usage of the more complicated products is far more minuscule than imagined by e.g. CFOs, etc. The real thing keeping many "in the fold" as it were would be authentication services. Which are overcomplicated and probably easier to manage without...

Right, it’s stuff like Active Directory and how everything’s tied together. Once you’re using that for auth, it’s really tough to back out without a lot of effort. We’ve looked into FreeIPA and similar options, but honestly, nothing really holds a candle to Active Directory yet.

AD and Domain Servers are like a cancer that will grow metastases around your org, costing user and client cals all over the place, even for every desk phone if you're not careful. The only winning move is never to play their game in the first place.

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#18
The trick with Microsoft is to very carefully separate the good parts from the bad ones.

Labeling all of Microsoft as banned is really constraining your technology options. This is a gigantic organization with a very diverse set of people in it.

There aren't many things like .NET, MSSQL and Visual Studio out there. The debugger experience in VS is the holy grail if you have super nasty real world technology situations. There's a reason every AAA game engine depends on it in some way.

Azure and Windows are where things start to get bad with Microsoft.

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right, it’s stuff like Active Directory and how everything’s tied together. Once you’re using that for auth, it’s really tough to back out without a lot of effort. We’ve looked into FreeIPA and similar options, but honestly, nothing really holds a candle to Active Directory yet.

AD and Domain Servers are like a cancer that will grow metastases around your org, costing user and client cals all over the place, even for every desk phone if you're not careful. The only winning move is never to play their game in the first place.

I'm in a situation where due to staff skillsets and ease of management then GPOs are required. Local GPOs would be insane to manage across thousands of PCs

Re: Microsoft Dependency Has Risks

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I wasn't aware of any major Trump-era policies that significantly reduced Microsoft’s dominance. Curious what you're referencing?

Trump has been outrageously hostile to our supposed European allies, and is extremely petty, vindictive, and doesn’t give a damn about security or privacy. Furthermore, the checks that would normally provide counter this like congress or the Supreme Court are currently stacked such that he can do horrendous things without consequence. Our media and tech companies are also more than happy to avoid challenging him.

Other countries reliant on US based cloud giants are understandably alarmed at his behavior, and it is now a strong possibility that Trump will attempt to use their reliance on our tech companies to wring from them whatever he wants.

So the idea of escaping US tech monopolies has become very popular among those paying attention.

Post reply on HN