My ChatGPT meter tells me that it *feels* like this was written by AI: Notice the excessive use of the em dash throughout the article combined with the sycophantic contrasts ChatGPT loves to use so much: "It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless." A sad state of affairs if the NYT is letting AI-slop through.
> No shrinking. No waiting. No apologizing.
> slowness, curiosity, accountability
> Avoidance. Exhaustion. Disrepair.
> It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation.