Live data from Hacker News

To fuel AI, US Congress moves to fast-track nuclear plant approvals

wsj.com

11–17 of 17 posts

Re: To fuel AI, US Congress moves to fast-track nuclear plant approvals

#11
We could probably double our solar and battery capacity in the same time as it takes to build a Nuclear Power plant even with removing all the barriers.

I was excited for using mini-reactors in coal plants but then when I realized that former coal plants are too radioactive to safely operate a nuclear plant without extensive cleanup was when I realized nuclear was a dead end.

Nuclear container ships though.

Re: To fuel AI, US Congress moves to fast-track nuclear plant approvals

#12
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're right on target with the over consumption line. AI is a drop in the bucket compared to the insanely unnecessary nonsense that people buy because they just want more crap. Anyone who is talking about how much energy AI uses should be looking at themselves and their communities as well. Change begins with small decisions/actions and americans have been convinced that small decisions/actions don't make a differen…

FWIW, the energy use per capita in the USA (and other western countries) is lower than in the 1970's and has been steady/declining [1]. Granted, some of the energy intensive manufacturing was outsourced to China and other places, but then again there's also an increase in efficiency standards (e.g. vehicles, heating etc). CO2 emissions per capita in Western countries (including the US) have peaked in the 1970s and ar…

[deleted]

Re: To fuel AI, US Congress moves to fast-track nuclear plant approvals

#13
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're right on target with the over consumption line. AI is a drop in the bucket compared to the insanely unnecessary nonsense that people buy because they just want more crap. Anyone who is talking about how much energy AI uses should be looking at themselves and their communities as well. Change begins with small decisions/actions and americans have been convinced that small decisions/actions don't make a differen…

FWIW, the energy use per capita in the USA (and other western countries) is lower than in the 1970's and has been steady/declining [1]. Granted, some of the energy intensive manufacturing was outsourced to China and other places, but then again there's also an increase in efficiency standards (e.g. vehicles, heating etc). CO2 emissions per capita in Western countries (including the US) have peaked in the 1970s and ar…

Those graphs are still damning for Americans and our extreme consumption.

Re: To fuel AI, US Congress moves to fast-track nuclear plant approvals

#14
post #7
post #4

Hard to believe that AI or any kind of acceleration towards digital economy (cloud etc) is responsible for the world's energy crisis. Could it be the over-consumption and production in the physical economy that's the culprit maybe? If data centers generate that much heat, which is the only reason it consumes significant energy, then should the focus be capturing that and turn it into another energy source?

You're right on target with the over consumption line. AI is a drop in the bucket compared to the insanely unnecessary nonsense that people buy because they just want more crap. Anyone who is talking about how much energy AI uses should be looking at themselves and their communities as well. Change begins with small decisions/actions and americans have been convinced that small decisions/actions don't make a differen…

> using less plastic(buy glass/metal stuff)

How about wooden/organic material? Glass and metal aren't eco friendly either, not even comparing to plastic.

My new epiphany is no durable material if I don't really need it.

Re: To fuel AI, US Congress moves to fast-track nuclear plant approvals

#15
post #14
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're right on target with the over consumption line. AI is a drop in the bucket compared to the insanely unnecessary nonsense that people buy because they just want more crap. Anyone who is talking about how much energy AI uses should be looking at themselves and their communities as well. Change begins with small decisions/actions and americans have been convinced that small decisions/actions don't make a differen…

> using less plastic(buy glass/metal stuff) How about wooden/organic material? Glass and metal aren't eco friendly either, not even comparing to plastic. My new epiphany is no durable material if I don't really need it.

[deleted]

Re: To fuel AI, US Congress moves to fast-track nuclear plant approvals

#16
post #14
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're right on target with the over consumption line. AI is a drop in the bucket compared to the insanely unnecessary nonsense that people buy because they just want more crap. Anyone who is talking about how much energy AI uses should be looking at themselves and their communities as well. Change begins with small decisions/actions and americans have been convinced that small decisions/actions don't make a differen…

> using less plastic(buy glass/metal stuff) How about wooden/organic material? Glass and metal aren't eco friendly either, not even comparing to plastic. My new epiphany is no durable material if I don't really need it.

>Glass and metal aren't eco friendly either, not even comparing to plastic.

They require remelting which is energy intensive but it's still way better than plastic. This is more of a "how is the energy created" problem and not really glass/metal's fault.

Sand mining is an issue but glass recycling is the goal, which reduces virgin sand use. Lots of industries use way more sand than glass production anyway. Metal production isn't great either but the goal is RECYCLING, not mining all new material.

Remember that plastic recycling is mostly a myth. Especially in consumer goods. Double especially in the US where basically no consumer plastic is recycled, it's mostly from industry.

There's a reason you can get cash for glass/metal at recyclers. Can't do that with plastic.

I really don't understand how recycled glass/metal are anywhere near as bad as plastic. You can use them forever whereas plastic breaks down quickly. This kind of sounds like misinformation put out to muddy the waters and give people an excuse to use more plastic.

Wood is fine but expensive/time consuming. If someone wants to use all wooden stuff great, but most folks aren't doing that so it's a moot point.

Re: To fuel AI, US Congress moves to fast-track nuclear plant approvals

#17
post #16
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> using less plastic(buy glass/metal stuff) How about wooden/organic material? Glass and metal aren't eco friendly either, not even comparing to plastic. My new epiphany is no durable material if I don't really need it.

>Glass and metal aren't eco friendly either, not even comparing to plastic. They require remelting which is energy intensive but it's still way better than plastic. This is more of a "how is the energy created" problem and not really glass/metal's fault. Sand mining is an issue but glass recycling is the goal, which reduces virgin sand use. Lots of industries use way more sand than glass production anyway. Metal prod…

Why does that have to be a pro-plastic misinformation?

Many of the same reasons that makes recyling plastic a myth, make recycling a myth for many materials. Unless you're disposing perfectly good stuff, most of glass will end up being broken glass in landfill. I really don't see how those broken pieces is gonna be picked up for recycling, they're gonna be in the environment for MUCH longer than plastic.

Post reply on HN