> WebOS—true multitasking when iOS and Android couldn't handle it Am I missing something?
I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
11–20 of 517 posts
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#12> WebOS—true multitasking when iOS and Android couldn't handle it Am I missing something?
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#13WebOS was neat for sure but HP was never in a position to compete with Apple. More mobile device launches would simply have meant more money down the drain.
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#14Is this actually the case?
I guess optically it might look bad to undo the WebOS but maybe just announce development of a NetOS which is the same except in name? Definitely people will be upset about the cancelation but retailers still have what 225k units they'd want to move so they can't be that upset about it uncanceled?
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#15> WebOS—true multitasking when iOS and Android couldn't handle it Am I missing something?
I think he's wrong about Android, although AFAIK Palm had a nicer task switching UI at first.
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#16> WebOS—true multitasking when iOS and Android couldn't handle it Am I missing something?
I must be missing the same, because I had a Palm back in the day, and the OS was IMHO absolute crapware
I don’t think HP was remotely interested in the previous operating system.
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#17Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#18Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#19> WebOS—true multitasking when iOS and Android couldn't handle it Am I missing something?
Dunno, it's a pretty straightforward statement.
WebOS was a legit Linux OS and had a lot of good features...
Re: I convinced HP's board to buy Palm and watched them kill it
#20> WebOS—true multitasking when iOS and Android couldn't handle it Am I missing something?
"To switch between apps on the iOS3 you hit the home button, which takes you home, and then select your next app. Your previous app, assuming it isn’t one of a very limited list of apps that have services that can run in the background (e.g. iPod, checking email), quits completely. Switching back to the previous app relaunches it."
"In iOS 4 Apple promises app level multitasking without sacrificing performance or battery life. A single push of the home button still takes you home, but a double tap will bring up a list of recently used apps along the bottom of the screen. Scroll to find the one you want to switch to, select it and you’ve just “multitasked” in iOS 4."
Even on the Palm Pilot, you could switch reasonably quickly between, say, the Memo Pad and the Calendar, and not lose context in either app because they restarted. The OS was structured around giving apps the ability to freeze their state easily and rapidly thaw it later. I believe Android had some stuff for that, but it wasn't as comprehensive as what Palm had, and I can't speak to iOS APIs at all.
(In 2025, the "solution" to this is largely to just leave the apps running in the background like a desktop, now that cell phones are substantially more powerful today than the desktops of the WebOS era. Whether WebOS could have made a superior phone back in the day, we'd still be where we are today either way.)
[1]: https://www.anandtech.com/show/3779/apples-ios-4-explored/2